CVE-2026-39479
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Brainstorm Force OttoKit suretriggers allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects OttoKit: from n/a through <= 1.1.20.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in the OttoKit WordPress plugin (suretriggers component). The vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through improperly sanitized user input, potentially leading to data exfiltration or database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate OttoKit plugin installationCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for the ottokit or suretriggers folder, or query the WordPress database in wp_options for option_name='active_plugins' to list enabled pluginsAffected if The ottokit or suretriggers plugin folder exists and is active in the WordPress installation
-
Determine installed OttoKit versionRead the main plugin file header (e.g., ottokit.php or suretriggers.php) to find the 'Version:' tag, or query the WordPress options table: SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name=' OttoKit_version' or similarAffected if The version read from the plugin header or database is 1.1.20 or lower
-
Verify suretriggers component is presentCheck for the suretriggers subdirectory within the OttoKit plugin folder (e.g., wp-content/plugins/ottokit/includes/suretriggers/) and inspect its main class files for SQL query functionsAffected if The suretriggers directory exists and contains files that handle database queries without visible parameterization
If OttoKit with suretriggers is installed and active at version 1.1.20 or below, the environment is vulnerable to unauthenticated blind SQL injection through the suretriggers component.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate OttoKit to the latest version once available, or implement proper parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database operations in the affected suretriggers component.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39479 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39479 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data