CVE-2026-39585
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Arraytics Booktics allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Booktics: from n/a through 1.0.16.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in Arraytics Booktics allows attackers to access resources or perform actions without proper authentication due to incorrectly configured access control security levels. This affects all versions up to 1.0.16. The vulnerability has a CVSS 5.3 indicating moderate severity.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Booktics is installedCheck for Booktics installation by looking for its main application files (e.g., booktics.php, booktics/index.php, or the Booktics directory in your web root or plugins folder). Access your website admin panel to confirm Booktics appears in the list of installed plugins or applications.Affected if Booktics is installed and active on the system
-
Determine installed Booktics versionLocate the version identifier in the main Booktics file (typically in the plugin header, README, or version.php file within the Booktics directory). Compare this version number against any known version releases of Booktics.Affected if The installed version is any release that contains the vulnerable access control logic
-
Identify access control security level configurationExamine Booktics settings for access control or security level configurations. Look for options labeled as security levels, access control, user roles, permission settings, or similar terms in the Booktics admin interface or configuration files.Affected if Security level settings exist and are set to a permissive or misconfigured value (e.g., no role restrictions, public access enabled for admin functions)
-
Test sensitive endpoints for unauthorized accessAttempt to access Booktics administrative functions, data export features, or user management endpoints directly via URL without authenticating or with a low-privilege account. Common paths include /admin, /settings, /users, /export, or API endpoints within the Booktics module.Affected if Sensitive functionality is accessible without proper authorization or role verification
If Booktics is installed with any access control configuration that permits unauthorized users to access sensitive functions or resources, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints and functions, ensuring access control security levels are correctly configured according to the principle of least privilege.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39585 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39585 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data