CVE-2026-39617
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in priyanshumittal Bluestreet bluestreet allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Bluestreet: from n/a through <= 1.7.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Bluestreet application (versions up to and including 1.7.3) allows remote attackers to execute unauthorized state-changing operations on behalf of authenticated users by tricking them into visiting malicious pages or clicking crafted links.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Bluestreet installationLocate the Bluestreet application by checking for its web interface, installed files, or running processes. Look for the application responding on typical ports or the presence of Bluestreet-specific directories and files.Affected if Bluestreet is present in the environment
-
Determine installed versionCheck the application's version by reviewing version files, examining the login page source, checking API endpoints that expose version information, or accessing admin/about pages that typically display version details.Affected if The installed version is 1.7.3 or lower
-
Identify state-changing operationsReview the application for endpoints that perform actions: user management, data modification, configuration changes, payment processing, or any operation that alters system state.Affected if The application has functional areas that modify data or settings
-
Inspect forms for anti-CSRF tokensExamine the HTML source of forms that perform state-changing operations. Look within form tags for a hidden input field containing a random token value (commonly named 'csrf_token', 'token', '_token', or similar) that is submitted with the form.Affected if State-changing forms lack anti-CSRF token fields in their HTML markup
-
Verify token validation on server-sideTest by submitting a state-changing request without the anti-CSRF token (or with an invalid token) and observe whether the server accepts or rejects the request.Affected if The server accepts requests without valid anti-CSRF tokens
A user is affected if Bluestreet version 1.7.3 or lower is running AND state-changing forms lack anti-CSRF token protection, allowing attackers to trigger unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) for all state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer headers on server-side to ensure requests originate from legitimate sources.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39617 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39617 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data