CVE-2026-39619
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in priyanshumittal Busiprof busiprof allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects Busiprof: from n/a through <= 2.5.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA CSRF vulnerability in the Busiprof WordPress theme allows remote attackers to trick authenticated administrators into uploading malicious files (web shells) to the server by tricking them into visiting a crafted page. The lack of anti-CSRF tokens on the file upload functionality enables this attack.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Busiprof theme is installedLocate the Busiprof theme folder in wp-content/themes/ or check via WordPress admin under Appearance > ThemesAffected if The Busiprof theme is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed Busiprof versionOpen the style.css file in the Busiprof theme directory and read the Version: header, or view theme details in WordPress admin panelAffected if The installed version has not been patched to include anti-CSRF protections
-
Examine file upload code for anti-CSRF tokensSearch theme PHP files for file upload handling functions, then verify if wp_nonce_field(), check_admin_referer(), or wp_verify_nonce() is called before processing uploadsAffected if The file upload handling code does not verify anti-CSRF tokens (nonces)
-
Check for capability checks on upload actionsInspect the file upload handler to confirm current_user_can() or similar authorization checks exist before processing uploaded filesAffected if No capability checks are performed before allowing file uploads
The environment is affected if Busiprof theme is installed and its file upload functionality lacks anti-CSRF token validation, allowing authenticated administrators to be tricked into uploading malicious files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all file upload forms and verify the request origin/tokens before processing any file uploads. Additionally, implement strict file type validation and upload directory restrictions.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39619 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39619 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data