Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2026-39671

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dotstore Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce woo-conditional-product-fees-for-checkout allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 4.3.3.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dotstore Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce (woo-conditional-product-fees-for-checkout) allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended state-changing actions by tricking their browsers into sending malicious requests. The vulnerability affects all versions through 4.3.3 of the plugin.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) for all state-changing operations in the plugin, verify Origin/Referer headers on POST requests, and apply SameSite cookie attributes to session cookies.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Dotstore Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce is installed
    Access WordPress admin dashboard and navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'Dotstore Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce' or similar naming in the plugin list.
    Affected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list with that name or similar
  2. Verify plugin is active on the WooCommerce site
    In the Plugins list, check if the Dotstore Extra Fees Plugin shows as 'Active' rather than 'Inactive' or 'Must Use'.
    Affected if Plugin is active and in use on the site
  3. Inspect admin forms for CSRF token presence
    Navigate to the plugin's admin settings pages (typically under WooCommerce > Extra Fees or similar). View page source (right-click > View Page Source) and search for 'wpnonce', '_wpnonce', or 'nonce' fields in all forms that modify fee configurations, add/remove conditional fees, or alter pricing rules.
    Affected if Forms modifying fee settings lack _wpnonce or wpnonce hidden input fields
  4. Check AJAX endpoints for nonce validation
    Use browser developer tools > Network tab. Trigger plugin AJAX actions (adding fees, modifying rules, saving settings). Examine the request headers and parameters for presence of a nonce value (typically named 'nonce', 'security', or ending in '_nonce').
    Affected if AJAX requests that modify plugin settings do not include a valid nonce parameter
  5. Test for Referer/Origin header validation
    Using a tool like Burp Suite or curl, manually send a state-changing request (such as adding a fee rule) with an incorrect or missing Origin/Referer header to see if the request is still processed.
    Affected if Requests with mismatched or missing Origin/Referer headers are processed successfully without validation

If the Dotstore Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce is active and its admin forms/AJAX endpoints lack proper nonce verification for state-changing operations, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2026-39671.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) for all state-changing operations in the plugin, verify Origin/Referer headers on POST requests, and apply SameSite cookie attributes to session cookies.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39671 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39671 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data