CVE-2026-39704
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in nfusionsolutions Precious Metals Automated Product Pricing – Pro precious-metals-automated-product-pricing-pro allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Precious Metals Automated Product Pricing – Pro: from n/a through <= 4.0.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in the WordPress plugin 'Precious Metals Automated Product Pricing – Pro' allows unauthenticated attackers to access functionality that should be restricted due to incorrectly configured access control security levels. The plugin fails to properly validate user permissions before allowing access to certain features or data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin installation and versionCheck WordPress plugin directory or admin panel for 'Precious Metals Automated Product Pricing - Pro' and note the installed version numberAffected if Plugin version is 4.0.5 or lower
-
Identify admin or privileged function endpointsReview plugin PHP files for functions handling sensitive operations (pricing updates, product data access, admin actions) and note their access modifiersAffected if Plugin contains sensitive functionality without visible capability checks or role verification
-
Inspect AJAX or REST API handlersSearch plugin files for add_action calls registering wp_ajax or REST API endpoints; examine if they include current_user_can() or similar authorization checksAffected if AJAX or REST endpoints exist without proper current_user_can() or role-based access control validation
-
Check nonce validation on sensitive actionsExamine plugin code for wp_nonce_field, wp_verify_nonce, or check_admin_referer calls on privileged operationsAffected if Sensitive actions lack nonce verification or permission checks before execution
-
Review capability requirements on callback functionsInspect plugin callback functions that handle data modifications or sensitive data retrieval for proper capability checks using current_user_can()Affected if Callback functions execute privileged actions without verifying user capabilities first
The environment is affected if the Precious Metals Automated Product Pricing - Pro plugin (versions up to 4.0.5) is installed and sensitive functionality is accessible without proper authorization, capability, or nonce validation checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive functions and endpoints, and verify that access control configurations are correctly set to enforce role-based permissions. Update to patched version if available.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39704 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39704 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data