CVE-2026-3992
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in CodeGenieApp serverless-express up to 4.17.1. This affects an unknown part of the file utils/dynamodb.ts of the component Users Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument filter causes injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn injection vulnerability exists in CodeGenieApp serverless-express up to version 4.17.1 in the utils/dynamodb.ts file's Users Endpoint. Attackers can manipulate the 'filter' argument to inject malicious input, likely enabling NoSQL injection attacks against DynamoDB queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed serverless-express versionRun npm list serverless-express or check package.json dependencies to identify the installed versionAffected if The installed version is 4.17.1 or earlier
-
Locate utils/dynamodb.ts fileSearch the codebase for the utils/dynamodb.ts file and confirm it exists within the projectAffected if The file exists and contains the Users Endpoint implementation
-
Inspect filter parameter handling in the Users EndpointReview the code handling the filter argument in the Users Endpoint within utils/dynamodb.tsAffected if The filter parameter is used directly in DynamoDB queries without parameterized binding or input validation
-
Confirm Users Endpoint is exposedCheck if the Users Endpoint API route is accessible (typically via API Gateway or direct HTTP exposure)Affected if The endpoint is publicly or internally accessible and accepts filter parameter input
You are affected if running serverless-express version 4.17.1 or earlier with the Users Endpoint from utils/dynamodb.ts exposed and using the filter parameter without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and parameterized query construction for the filter parameter in the dynamodb.ts Users Endpoint to prevent injection. Alternatively, use AWS DynamoDB's built-in query builders with sanitized parameter binding.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-3992 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-3992 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data