CVE-2026-40079
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCacti is an open source performance and fault management framework. Versions 1.2.30 and prior are vulnerable to Command Injection due to lack of sanitization in the escape_command() function. The escape_command() function at lib/rrd.php is a no-op: it returns $command unchanged. The command line built by rrdtool_function_graph() is passed through this function and then to shell_exec($full_commandline). The risk is in __rrd_execute() where text_format values from graph templates (which may contain host variable substitutions) reach shell_exec without adequate escaping. This issue has been addressed in version 1.2.31.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCacti versions 1.2.30 and prior contain a command injection vulnerability where the escape_command() function in lib/rrd.php is a no-op that returns input unchanged. Text_format values from graph templates containing host variable substitutions reach shell_exec() without proper sanitization, allowing arbitrary command execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.2.31CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Cacti versionCheck the installed Cacti version (typically visible on the Cacti login page footer or in include/global_arrays.php). Compare it against the affected range: versions prior to 1.2.31 are vulnerable.Affected if Installed version is 1.2.30 or prior, or any version shown as < 1.2.31
-
Locate vulnerable escape_command functionInspect the file lib/rrd.php in the Cacti installation directory. Locate the escape_command() function definition and examine whether it performs any sanitization or returns input unchanged.Affected if The escape_command() function exists but performs no sanitization (returns input unchanged or is a no-op)
-
Examine graph template text_format configurationsAccess Cacti web interface, navigate to Templates > Graph Templates. Review any custom graph templates for text_format fields that contain host variable substitutions (such as $|host_| or similar host-related variables).Affected if Graph templates contain text_format fields with host variable substitutions that could be interpreted by shell_exec()
-
Verify web interface accessibilityDetermine if the Cacti web interface is exposed to untrusted networks or if authentication is enforced. The vulnerability requires access to the web interface to trigger the command injection through graph template configuration.Affected if Cacti web interface is accessible to untrusted users without proper access controls
A system is affected if it runs Cacti version 1.2.30 or prior AND has graph templates with text_format host variable substitutions accessible via the web interface, allowing the escape_command() bypass in lib/rrd.php to reach shell_exec().
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.2.31
Upgrade Cacti to version 1.2.31 or later. As an interim measure, restrict access to the Cacti web interface and disable or carefully control graph template text_format configurations that could inject variables.
1.2.31
- 1. Back up your Cacti installation and database before proceeding with any upgrade
- 2. Download Cacti version 1.2.31 from the official Cacti website or GitHub releases
- 3. Extract the new version files to your web server document root
- 4. Run any required database upgrade scripts (refer to the upgrade documentation included in the release)
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by logging into the Cacti web interface
- 6. Test graph generation to confirm the vulnerability has been patched
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40079 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40079 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data