PraisonaiApplication · Praison

CVE-2026-40156

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.5.128 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.128, PraisonAI automatically loads a file named tools.py from the current working directory to discover and register custom agent tools. This loading process uses importlib.util.spec_from_file_location and immediately executes module-level code via spec.loader.exec_module() without explicit user consent, validation, or sandboxing. The tools.py file is loaded implicitly, even when it is not referenced in configuration files or explicitly requested by the user. As a result, merely placing a file named tools.py in the working directory is sufficient to trigger code execution. This behavior violates the expected security boundary between user-controlled project files (e.g., YAML configurations) and executable code, as untrusted content in the working directory is treated as trusted and executed automatically. If an attacker can place a malicious tools.py file into a directory where a user or automated system (e.g., CI/CD pipeline) runs praisonai, arbitrary code execution occurs immediately upon startup, before any agent logic begins. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.128.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

PraiAI automatically imports and executes a tools.py file from the current working directory using importlib without any validation or user consent. An attacker can achieve arbitrary code execution by placing a malicious tools.py file in any directory where PraisonAI runs.

MitigationUpgrade to PraisonAI version 4.5.128 or later, which removes the automatic tools.py loading. Additionally, ensure untrusted users cannot write files to directories where PraisonAI executes.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PraisonaiApplication
Affected:< 4.5.128

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed PraisonAI version
    Run 'pip show praisonai' or 'pip list | grep praisonai' to see the installed version number
    Affected if Version is less than 4.5.128
  2. Locate tools.py files in your environment
    Search for any tools.py files in directories where you run or plan to run PraisonAI: 'find /path/to/your/directories -name tools.py 2>/dev/null'
    Affected if A tools.py file exists in any directory where PraisonAI executes and the version is vulnerable
  3. Verify directory write permissions
    Check which users have write access to directories where PraisonAI runs: 'ls -la /path/to/directory' for each working directory
    Affected if Untrusted users can write files to directories where PraisonAI executes
  4. Inspect tools.py for malicious content
    If tools.py exists, review its contents: 'cat /path/to/directory/tools.py'
    Affected if The file contains unknown or suspicious code that you did not intentionally create

You are affected if you are running PraisonAI version below 4.5.128 AND have a tools.py file in any directory where PraisonAI runs, especially if untrusted users can write to that directory.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.5.128 or later
Fixed in 4.5.128
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to PraisonAI version 4.5.128 or later, which removes the automatic tools.py loading. Additionally, ensure untrusted users cannot write files to directories where PraisonAI executes.

Recommended fix High confidence

4.5.128

  1. Upgrade PraisonAI to version 4.5.128 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Praisonai Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,210
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40156 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40156 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data