CVE-2026-40159
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.128, PraisonAI’s MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration allows spawning background servers via stdio using user-supplied command strings (e.g., MCP("npx -y @smithery/cli ...")). These commands are executed through Python’s subprocess module. By default, the implementation forwards the entire parent process environment to the spawned subprocess. As a result, any MCP command executed in this manner inherits all environment variables from the host process, including sensitive data such as API keys, authentication tokens, and database credentials. This behavior introduces a security risk when untrusted or third-party commands are used. In common scenarios where MCP tools are invoked via package runners such as npx -y, arbitrary code from external or potentially compromised packages may execute with access to these inherited environment variables. This creates a risk of unintended credential exposure and enables potential supply chain attacks through silent exfiltration of secrets. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.128.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePraisonAI's MCP integration spawns background servers via stdio using user-supplied command strings executed through Python's subprocess module. The implementation forwards the entire parent process environment to spawned subprocesses, causing sensitive data such as API keys, authentication tokens, and database credentials to be inherited by potentially untrusted or compromised external packages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.5.128CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed PraisonAI versionRun 'pip show praisonai' or 'pip list | grep -i praison' to see the installed version numberAffected if The version listed is less than 4.5.128 (e.g., 4.5.100, 4.4.0, etc.)
-
Verify MCP integration is in useInspect your codebase or configuration files for MCP client initialization, particularly any usage of stdio-based server spawning with user-supplied command stringsAffected if Your application initializes or uses MCP clients that spawn background servers via stdio using subprocess with command strings from user input
-
Identify sensitive environment variables presentRun 'env | grep -iE "(api|token|secret|key|password|credential)"' in the shell where PraisonAI runs to list exposed sensitive variablesAffected if API keys, authentication tokens, database credentials, or other secrets exist in the parent process environment that should not be passed to external packages
-
Check subprocess spawn configurationReview the source code of the MCP integration (file paths like mcp/client/stdio.py or similar) to confirm subprocess is called with inherit_env=True or equivalent default behaviorAffected if The subprocess invocation does not explicitly disable environment variable inheritance (e.g., uses env=None or does not set env={})
You are affected if you run PraisonAI version below 4.5.128 AND use MCP integration that spawns subprocesses with full environment variable inheritance, allowing sensitive credentials to be passed to external packages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.5.128
Update PraisonAI to version 4.5.128 or later, which fixes the environment variable inheritance issue.
4.5.128
- Upgrade PraisonAI to version 4.5.128 or later by running the appropriate package manager command (e.g., pip install prasionai==4.5.128 or pip install --upgrade prasionai)
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
- If using MCP integrations, test that they function correctly after the upgrade to confirm the environment variable isolation fix is working
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40159 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40159 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data