CVE-2026-40166
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedauthentik is an open-source identity provider. In versions prior to 2025.12.5 and 2026.2.0-rc1 through 2026.2.2, authenticated non-admin users with at least one OAuth2 access token can retrieve the client_secret of confidential OAuth2 providers they have previously authenticated against, exposing sensitive information to users without the correct permissions. This logic is GET /api/v3/oauth2/access_tokens/. The API response includes a nested provider object containing client_id and client_secret for providers configured with client_type: confidential, which should not be accessible to low-privilege users. This issue has been fixed in versions 2025.12.5 and 2026.2.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNon-admin authenticated users with OAuth2 access tokens can retrieve client_secrets of confidential OAuth2 providers via the GET /api/v3/oauth2/access_tokens/ endpoint. The API response incorrectly includes a nested provider object containing both client_id and client_secret for confidential client types, exposing sensitive credentials to unauthorized users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed authentik versionRun 'ak version' or check the Docker container/image tag or Helm chart version deployed in your environment. Compare against fixed versions 2025.12.5 and 2026.2.3.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 2025.12.5 or between 2026.0.0 and 2026.2.2 (not inclusive).
-
Confirm OAuth2 providers are configuredNavigate to the authentik admin UI, go to the OAuth2 provider section, or query the /api/v3/oauth2/provider/ endpoint using an authenticated session to list configured providers.Affected if Any OAuth2 providers are defined in the system, particularly confidential providers that use client_id and client_secret.
-
Verify non-admin user access to the token endpointUsing a non-admin user account (not assigned admin privileges), authenticate and make a GET request to /api/v3/oauth2/access_tokens/. Check the HTTP response status and content.Affected if The endpoint returns a 200 OK response with token data when accessed by a non-admin user, rather than returning 403 Forbidden.
-
Check for credential exposure in API responseExamine the JSON response from /api/v3/oauth2/access_tokens/ for any fields containing 'client_id' or 'client_secret' values that should be restricted.Affected if The response includes actual client_secret values in plain text for any OAuth2 provider object.
You are affected if your authentik version is before 2025.12.5 or between 2026.0.0 and 2026.2.2, and non-admin users can retrieve OAuth2 provider credentials from the access_tokens endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade authentik to version 2025.12.5 or 2026.2.3 which contains the fix. Additionally, rotate any potentially exposed OAuth2 client_secrets as a precaution.
2025.12.5 or 2026.2.3 (or later stable release)
- Identify the currently running version of authentik by checking the system or deployment configuration
- If running a version prior to 2025.12.5, upgrade to version 2025.12.5 or later
- If running version 2026.2.0-rc1 through 2026.2.2, upgrade to version 2026.2.3 or later
- After upgrading, verify that non-admin users can no longer access client_secret values via the /api/v3/oauth2/access_tokens/ endpoint
- Review OAuth2 provider configurations to ensure client_type settings are appropriate for your security requirements
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40166 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40166 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data