CVE-2026-4017
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer Overflow in the entry handler of the TraceEvent() system call could allow an attacker with local access to cause information disclosure, data tampering or a crash of the QNX Neutrino kernel.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer overflow exists in the entry handler of the TraceEvent() system call in QNX Neutrino RTOS. An attacker with local access can exploit this to achieve information disclosure, data tampering, or cause a kernel crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify QNX Neutrino RTOS installationRun 'uname -a' or check system information to confirm the OS is QNX Neutrino. Look for 'QNX' or 'Neutrino' in the outputAffected if The system is running QNX Neutrino RTOS
-
Determine QNX Neutrino versionExecute 'uname -v' or 'version' command to obtain the exact version number. Compare this against the affected version ranges for CVE-2026-4017Affected if The installed version falls within the vulnerable version ranges (if known) or is unpatched
-
Verify TraceEvent system call presenceCheck if the TraceEvent() system call is available on the system. This may involve examining system call tables or attempting to invoke the syscall through debugging or tracing toolsAffected if The TraceEvent system call exists and is accessible to local users
-
Assess local access controlsReview local user accounts and shell access permissions using commands like 'who', 'id', or examining user/group configurationsAffected if Untrusted local users can access the system and potentially invoke the vulnerable TraceEvent system call
System is affected if running QNX Neutrino RTOS with the TraceEvent system call accessible to untrusted local users in a version that has not been patched for CVE-2026-4017
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patches for QNX Neutrino; restrict local access to trusted personnel and verify system call handling.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4017 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4017 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data