CVE-2026-40190
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLangSmith Client SDKs provide SDK's for interacting with the LangSmith platform. Prior to 0.5.18, the LangSmith JavaScript/TypeScript SDK (langsmith) contains an incomplete prototype pollution fix in its internally vendored lodash set() utility. The baseAssignValue() function only guards against the __proto__ key, but fails to prevent traversal via constructor.prototype. This allows an attacker who controls keys in data processed by the createAnonymizer() API to pollute Object.prototype, affecting all objects in the Node.js process. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.5.18.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe LangSmith JavaScript/TypeScript SDK contains an incomplete prototype pollution fix in its vendored lodash set() utility. The baseAssignValue() function guards against direct __proto__ key assignment but fails to prevent traversal via constructor.prototype, allowing attackers who control keys in data processed by the createAnonymizer() API to pollute Object.prototype and affect all objects in the Node.js process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.5.18CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed langsmith SDK versionRun 'npm list langsmith' or check package.json for the langsmith dependency version entryAffected if The version listed is lower than 0.5.18 (e.g., 0.5.17, 0.5.0, etc.)
-
Check for createAnonymizer usage in codebaseSearch your codebase for imports or usage of 'createAnonymizer' from langsmith (e.g., grep for 'createAnonymizer' or 'from "langsmith"')Affected if The createAnonymizer function is imported and used in your application code
-
Inspect anonymizer input data flowReview where createAnonymizer is called and examine whether external/user-controlled data can reach the 'keys' parameter passed to this functionAffected if Untrusted input can influence the keys argument passed to createAnonymizer, enabling prototype pollution via constructor.prototype traversal
-
Verify lodash set() protection in langsmithIf possible, inspect the bundled langsmith node_modules/langsmith/dist/cjs/utils.js (or similar) and locate the baseAssignValue function to confirm it only checks __proto__ and not constructor.prototypeAffected if The baseAssignValue function lacks protection against constructor.prototype key traversal
-
Confirm Node.js runtime contextVerify this runs in a Node.js environment (not browser) as prototype pollution via constructor.prototype is a Node.js-specific attack vector for this flawAffected if Your application runs in Node.js and uses the vulnerable langsmith SDK version
You are affected if your installed langsmith SDK version is below 0.5.18 AND your code uses createAnonymizer with potentially untrusted input in the keys parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.5.18
Upgrade the langsmith SDK to version 0.5.18 or later to apply the complete prototype pollution fix.
0.5.18 or later
- Identify all projects and dependencies that include the langsmith package
- Update the langsmith package to version 0.5.18 or later using your package manager (e.g., npm install [email protected] or npm update langsmith)
- Verify the installed version is 0.5.18 or higher by checking package.json or running npm list langsmith
- Test the application to ensure the update does not break existing functionality, particularly any usage of createAnonymizer() API
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40190 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40190 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data