ZrokApplication · Netfoundry

CVE-2026-40303

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.0.1 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
zrok is software for sharing web services, files, and network resources. Prior to version 2.0.1, endpoints.GetSessionCookie parses an attacker-supplied cookie chunk count and calls make([]string, count) with no upper bound before any token validation occurs. The function is reached on every request to an OAuth-protected proxy share, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger gigabyte-scale heap allocations per request, leading to process-level OOM termination or repeated goroutine panics. Both publicProxy and dynamicProxy are affected. Version 2.0.1 patches the issue.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The endpoints.GetSessionCookie function in zrok parses an attacker-supplied cookie chunk count value and passes it directly to make([]string, count) without any upper bound validation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to trigger gigabyte-scale heap allocations per request to OAuth-protected proxy shares, leading to OOM termination or goroutine panics.

MitigationUpgrade to zrok version 2.0.1 or later which patches this vulnerability; until then, consider rate-limiting or temporarily disabling OAuth-protected proxy shares to mitigate unauthenticated heap exhaustion attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ZrokApplication
Affected:< 2.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify zrok installation and version
    Run 'zrok --version' or check the installed zrok binary version using your system's package manager (e.g., dpkg, rpm, brew) or by inspecting the binary directly
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 2.0.1 (e.g., 2.0.0, 1.x.x, or any pre-2.0.1 release)
  2. Confirm the vulnerable code path is present
    Inspect the binary or source code for the endpoints.GetSessionCookie function and verify it uses make([]string, count) without bounds checking on the count parameter
    Affected if The GetSessionCookie function lacks upper bound validation on the cookie chunk count before calling make([]string, count)
  3. Determine if OAuth-protected proxy shares are configured
    Review zrok configuration files (typically in /etc/zrok, ~/.zrok, or the directory where zrok configuration is stored) and check for proxy share definitions that reference OAuth authentication providers
    Affected if OAuth-protected proxy shares are enabled and exposed to unauthenticated network requests

You are affected if you have zrok version < 2.0.1 running with OAuth-protected proxy shares exposed to the network, as this allows unauthenticated heap exhaustion attacks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.0.1 or later
Fixed in 2.0.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to zrok version 2.0.1 or later which patches this vulnerability; until then, consider rate-limiting or temporarily disabling OAuth-protected proxy shares to mitigate unauthenticated heap exhaustion attacks.

Recommended fix High confidence

2.0.1

  1. Upgrade zrok to version 2.0.1 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Zrok Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,540
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40303 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40303 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data