CVE-2026-40372
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper verification of cryptographic signature in ASP.NET Core allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability in ASP.NET Core involves improper verification of cryptographic signatures, allowing unauthenticated attackers to elevate privileges over a network. The flaw enables bypass of signature validation logic, potentially allowing attackers to forge tokens or messages that would be trusted by the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed ASP.NET Core runtime versionRun 'dotnet --list-runtimes' in command prompt or check the installed runtime version via Control Panel > Programs and Features. Look for entries starting with 'Microsoft.AspNetCore.App' or 'Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App'.Affected if The runtime version falls within 10.0.0 through 10.0.6 (the affected range before the patch).
-
Identify installed ASP.NET Core SDK versionRun 'dotnet --list-sdks' in command prompt. Note the SDK version number displayed.Affected if The SDK version is 10.0.0 through 10.0.106 (corresponding to unpatched releases).
-
Locate authentication configuration in application codeInspect the application's startup or Program.cs file for calls to 'AddJwtBearer', 'AddCookie', 'AddOpenIdConnect', or other authentication handlers. Also check for 'services.AddAuthentication()' calls and any token validation parameters.Affected if JWT bearer authentication, cookie authentication, or OpenID Connect authentication is configured and uses signature validation for tokens.
-
Check for custom token or data signing implementationsSearch codebase for classes implementing 'ISecurityTokenValidator', 'SecurityTokenHandler', or custom implementations of token creation/validation. Look for usage of 'JsonWebTokenHandler' or 'JwtSecurityTokenHandler'.Affected if Custom or built-in token handling code that performs cryptographic signature verification on tokens is present in the application.
-
Review Data Protection API usage for signed dataInspect code for calls to 'IDataProtectionProvider' or 'IDataProtection' to protect/unprotect data. Check if 'ITicketStore' implementations are used for cookie authentication session storage.Affected if ASP.NET Core Data Protection API is used for signing cookies, tokens, or other data payloads that could be forged.
A system is affected if it runs any ASP.NET Core version between 10.0.0 and 10.0.6 inclusive AND utilizes authentication or data signing mechanisms that rely on cryptographic signature validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.7
Apply the latest ASP.NET Core security updates and patch all affected instances. Review and validate that cryptographic signature verification is correctly implemented in all authentication paths, particularly around token validation and message signing.
ASP.NET Core 10.0.7
- 1. Identify all ASP.NET Core installations in your environment running version 10.0.0 through 10.0.6.
- 2. Plan the upgrade during a maintenance window to minimize disruption.
- 3. Download and install ASP.NET Core version 10.0.7 or later from the official Microsoft download page or your package manager.
- 4. After upgrading, verify that all applications dependent on the .NET runtime are functioning correctly.
- 5. Test any authentication or authorization workflows that rely on cryptographic signature verification, as the fix addresses improper signature verification.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40372 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40372 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data