CVE-2026-40398
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Remote Desktop allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Remote Desktop service allows a local authorized attacker to corrupt heap memory and elevate privileges to higher integrity levels. The vulnerability stems from improper bounds checking when handling Remote Desktop protocol operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9140< 10.0.17763.8755< 10.0.19044.7291< 10.0.19045.7291< 10.0.22631.7079< 10.0.26100.8390< 10.0.26200.8390< 10.0.28000.2113CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows version and build numberOpen Command Prompt and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to see the exact Windows version and build numberAffected if The build number falls below the threshold for your Windows version (see version-specific thresholds in the CVE)
-
Verify Remote Desktop service statusOpen Services (services.msc) and check if 'Remote Desktop Services' (TermService) is running, or run 'sc query TermService' in Command PromptAffected if Remote Desktop service is enabled and running - the vulnerability exists in the RDP service itself
-
Check RDP registry configurationRun 'reg query "HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server" /v fDenyTSConnections' in Command Prompt - a value of 0 means RDP is enabledAffected if The registry value shows RDP is enabled (fDenyTSConnections = 0)
-
Compare installed version against affected rangesMatch your Windows edition/version to the list: Windows 10 1607 needs build < 14393.9140, 1809 needs < 17763.8755, 21h2 needs < 19044.7291, 22h2 needs < 19045.7291, Windows 11 23h2 needs < 22631.7079, 24h2 needs < 26100.8390, 25h2 needs < 26200.8390, 26h1 needs < 28000.2113Affected if Your installed build number is lower than the threshold for your specific Windows version
You are affected if Remote Desktop is enabled AND your Windows build number is below the threshold for your Windows version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.914010.0.17763.875510.0.19044.7291
Apply Microsoft security updates for Windows Remote Desktop when released. Disable Remote Desktop if not required, and restrict local access to trusted users only.
Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.9140 | Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.8755 | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.7291 | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.7291 | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.7079 | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.8390 | Windows 11 25h2: 10.0.26200.8390 | Windows 11 26h1: 10.0.28000.2113
- Identify the current Windows version and build number by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- Determine which Windows release version (1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, 23h2, 24h2, 25h2, or 26h1) matches your system
- Apply the appropriate Windows Update or manually install the security update corresponding to your release version
- Verify the installation was successful by checking the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your release
- Restart the system if prompted to complete the update installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40398 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40398 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data