CVE-2026-40399
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows TCP/IP allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in the Windows TCP/IP stack where improper synchronization of shared resources allows a locally authenticated attacker to elevate privileges to SYSTEM level by winning a race condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9140< 10.0.17763.8755< 10.0.19044.7291< 10.0.19045.7291< 10.0.22631.7079< 10.0.26100.8390< 10.0.26200.8390< 10.0.28000.2113CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows build versionRun 'winver' from the Run dialog or execute 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' in Command Prompt to obtain the exact build numberAffected if The displayed build number falls below any of these thresholds: 14393.9140 (Win10 1607), 17763.8755 (Win10 1809), 19044.7291 (Win10 21h2/22h2), 22631.7079 (Win11 23h2), 26100.8390 (Win11 24h2), 26200.8390 (Win11 25h2), or 28000.2113 (Win11 26h1)
-
Confirm TCP/IP stack is in useVerify network connectivity is enabled; open Network Connections (ncpa.cpl), right-click your active network adapter, and select Status. Alternatively, run 'netsh interface ipv4 show interfaces' to confirm TCP/IPv4 is boundAffected if TCP/IP is a default component in Windows and is typically enabled on any system with network access; most standard installations are affected if the build version is vulnerable
-
Verify local user authentication contextCheck for existing local user accounts by running 'net user' in Command Prompt. The vulnerability requires an attacker to have authenticated local access to win the race conditionAffected if The presence of any local user account (beyond the built-in Administrator) indicates a potential attack vector, though this vulnerability can affect any authenticated local user
A system is affected if it runs any Windows version with a build number lower than the thresholds listed for its specific Windows release (10 or 11, version/feature update).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.914010.0.17763.875510.0.19044.7291
Apply Microsoft security updates for Windows TCP/IP when released; given the high CVSS and local privilege escalation vector, prioritize patching on all affected Windows systems.
Install the appropriate Windows security update containing the fix for CVE-2026-40399 (TCP/IP privilege elevation) matching your Windows version - builds range from 10.0.14393.9140 to 10.0.28000.2113 depending on Windows release
- 1. Identify the current Windows version and build number by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- 2. Determine which Windows 10 or 11 version and build is currently installed
- 3. For Windows 10 1607: Upgrade to build 10.0.14393.9140 or later
- 4. For Windows 10 1809: Upgrade to build 10.0.17763.8755 or later
- 5. For Windows 10 21h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.19044.7291 or later
- 6. For Windows 10 22h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.19045.7291 or later
- 7. For Windows 11 23h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.22631.7079 or later
- 8. For Windows 11 24h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.26100.8390 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40399 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40399 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data