CVE-2026-40462
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect permission assignment vulnerabilities exist in iControl REST and TMOS shell (tmsh) undisclosed command which may allow an authenticated attacker to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceF5 BIG-IP systems contain incorrect permission assignment vulnerabilities in iControl REST and TMOS shell (tmsh) interfaces. An authenticated attacker with standard user credentials can exploit these permission misconfigurations to view sensitive information that should be restricted based on role-based access controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed BIG-IP versionRun `tmsh show sys version` or `bigpipe version` from the command line to retrieve the exact software versionAffected if The version falls within 16.1.0-16.1.6, 17.1.0-17.1.3, 17.5.0-17.5.1, or equals 21.0.0
-
Confirm iControl REST interface is accessibleVerify the iControl REST daemon is running using `tmsh list rest daemon` or by checking if port 443 with REST API responds to requestsAffected if iControl REST is exposed and accepting authenticated requests
-
Review user role assignments in tmshRun `tmsh list auth user` to enumerate all local users and their assigned roles. Check for standard or limited roles that should not have elevated accessAffected if Standard users exist with roles that may grant unintended access to sensitive resources
-
Test for privilege escalation via REST APIUsing a standard (non-admin) user account, attempt GET requests to restricted endpoints such as `/mgmt/tm/sys/` or `/mgmt/shared/authz/users/` to see if sensitive data is returnedAffected if A standard user account can retrieve information that should be restricted to administrator roles
Your environment is affected if the BIG-IP version matches one of the vulnerable ranges AND iControl REST is accessible to standard users who can view restricted data beyond their intended role permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied patches or updates for affected F5 BIG-IP versions. Review and enforce least-privilege principles in iControl REST and tmsh role configurations to ensure users can only access resources appropriate to their assigned roles.
16.1.7+, 17.1.4+, 17.5.2+, or 21.0.1+ (depending on your major version branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed BIG-IP version by running `tmsh show sys version` or checking the management console.
- 2. Determine which BIG-IP module (APM, AFM, ASM, etc.) is in use and its specific version.
- 3. For BIG-IP version 16.1.x: Upgrade to version 16.1.7 or later.
- 4. For BIG-IP version 17.1.x: Upgrade to version 17.1.4 or later.
- 5. For BIG-IP version 17.5.x: Upgrade to version 17.5.2 or later.
- 6. For BIG-IP version 21.0.x: Upgrade to version 21.0.1 or later.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the fix by confirming the version in the management console or via `tmsh show sys version`.
- 8. Review iControl REST and tmsh permissions to ensure only authorized administrators have access to sensitive commands.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40462 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40462 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data