CVE-2026-40574
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOAuth2 Proxy is a reverse proxy that provides authentication using OAuth2 providers. Prior to 7.15.2, an authorization bypass exists in OAuth2 Proxy as part of the email_domain enforcement option. An attacker may be able to authenticate with an email claim such as [email protected]@company.com and satisfy an allowed domain check for company.com, even though the claim is not a valid email address. The issue ONLY affects deployments that rely on email_domain restrictions and accept email claim values from identity providers or claim mappings that do not strictly enforce normal email syntax. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.15.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOAuth2 Proxy versions prior to 7.15.2 contain an authorization bypass in the email_domain enforcement feature. Attackers can bypass domain restrictions by providing malformed email claims like [email protected]@company.com, which passes the domain check for company.com despite not being a valid email address. This only affects deployments relying on email_domain restrictions with identity providers or claim mappings that don't enforce strict email syntax.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.15.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OAuth2 Proxy versionRun 'oauth2-proxy --version' or check the binary version installed in your environmentAffected if The installed version is below 7.15.2 (e.g., 7.15.1, 7.15.0, earlier versions)
-
Verify email_domain configuration is in useReview your OAuth2 Proxy configuration file (yaml/json) for the 'email_domains' or 'email_domain' setting, or check for '--email-domain' flag in your startup commandAffected if email_domain or email_domains is configured with one or more allowed domains
-
Inspect identity provider claim mappingReview your identity provider (IdP) configuration (e.g., Azure AD, Okta, Google, Keycloak) to see how email claims are mapped and whether the IdP validates email format strictlyAffected if The IdP does not enforce strict RFC-compliant email syntax and passes through arbitrary claim values as the email
-
Audit existing user sessions for malformed emailsIf you have access to logs or user databases, search for email values containing multiple '@' symbols or unusual patterns (e.g., '[email protected]@company.com')Affected if Any user records contain malformed email addresses that bypass your intended domain restrictions
You are affected if your OAuth2 Proxy version is below 7.15.2 AND you use email_domain restrictions with an IdP that allows non-strict email claim formats.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.15.2
Upgrade OAuth2 Proxy to version 7.15.2 or later. Additionally, review identity provider configurations to ensure email claims strictly enforce valid email syntax, and audit existing user access patterns for potential exploitation.
7.15.2
- Backup your current OAuth2 Proxy configuration and deployment
- Review the OAuth2 Proxy 7.15.2 release notes for any configuration or behavioral changes
- Upgrade OAuth2 Proxy to version 7.15.2 using your deployment method (package manager, container image, binary, etc.)
- After upgrade, verify the email_domain restriction now correctly rejects malformed email claims like '[email protected]@company.com'
- Test that legitimate users with valid email addresses in your allowed domains can still authenticate
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40574 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40574 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data