CVE-2026-40576
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedexcel-mcp-server is a Model Context Protocol server for Excel file manipulation. A path traversal vulnerability exists in excel-mcp-server versions up to and including 0.1.7. When running in SSE or Streamable-HTTP transport mode (the documented way to use this server remotely), an unauthenticated attacker on the network can read, write, and overwrite arbitrary files on the host filesystem by supplying crafted filepath arguments to any of the 25 exposed MCP tool handlers. The server is intended to confine file operations to a directory set by the EXCEL_FILES_PATH environment variable. The function responsible for enforcing this boundary — get_excel_path() — fails to do so due to two independent flaws: it passes absolute paths through without any check, and it joins relative paths without resolving or validating the result. Combined with zero authentication on the default network-facing transport and a default bind address of 0.0.0.0 (all interfaces), this allows trivial remote exploitation. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.1.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePath traversal vulnerability in excel-mcp-server's get_excel_path() function allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read/write arbitrary files on the host by supplying crafted absolute or unvalidated relative paths via MCP tool handlers. The function fails to enforce the EXCEL_FILES_PATH boundary restriction due to two flaws: absolute paths pass through unchecked, and relative paths are joined without resolving/validating the result. Combined with zero authentication on default SSE/Streamable-HTTP transports bound to 0.0.0.0, this enables trivial remote exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if excel-mcp-server is runningCheck running processes or container instances for excel-mcp-server. Look for process listings, container logs, or service management tools showing the server active.Affected if excel-mcp-server is actively running in the environment
-
Determine the installed versionRun the package manager command or CLI tool to retrieve the excel-mcp-server version (e.g., npm list, pip show, or server --version), then compare it to the affected range below version 0.1.8.Affected if The installed version is prior to 0.1.8 (any 0.x.y version where y < 8 or where the 0.x series is less than 0.1)
-
Verify network binding configurationInspect the server startup configuration or runtime settings for the transport binding. Look for bind addresses in config files, environment variables, or command-line arguments.Affected if The server is bound to 0.0.0.0 (all interfaces) rather than localhost or a restricted address
-
Confirm authentication statusReview the server configuration for authentication settings. Check whether any authentication mechanism (tokens, API keys, OAuth) is enabled in the config files or environment.Affected if No authentication is configured or authentication is explicitly disabled (default un-authenticated state)
-
Inspect EXCEL_FILES_PATH settingLocate the EXCEL_FILES_PATH configuration in config files, environment variables, or runtime settings. Verify whether it is set and what directory it points to.Affected if EXCEL_FILES_PATH is configured and the server accepts file path inputs without additional validation layers
The environment is likely affected if excel-mcp-server version is below 0.1.8, the service is exposed on 0.0.0.0, and authentication is not enforced, allowing unauthenticated path traversal attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade excel-mcp-server to version 0.1.8 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, ensure the server is not exposed to untrusted networks or implement network-level access controls.
0.1.8
- Check the currently installed version of excel-mcp-server
- Upgrade excel-mcp-server to version 0.1.8 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40576 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40576 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data