CVE-2026-40603
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedChartbrew is an open-source web application that can connect directly to databases and APIs and use the data to create charts. In version 4.9.0, Chartbrew exposes a legacy dashboard route that returns a project's report data to any authenticated member of the same team, even when that user does not have access to the specific project. The route bypasses project-level authorization and returns the raw project object. As a result, a low-privileged same-team user can read another project's dashboard data and recover the project's stored report password from the response. This issue has been patched in version 5.0.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceChartbrew 4.9.0 contains a legacy dashboard route that bypasses project-level authorization, allowing any authenticated team member to access another project's report data and recover stored report passwords from the raw project object response.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Chartbrew installation versionLocate the Chartbrew instance and check its version (typically found in package.json, a version file, or the application's about/ status page). Compare the installed version to the affected range: version 4.9.0Affected if The installed version is exactly 4.9.0 or falls within the 4.x range prior to the patched version 5.0.0
-
Confirm legacy dashboard route is accessibleAttempt to access the legacy dashboard route endpoint (typically /dash/legacy or similar path referencing legacy dashboard functionality). This can be tested via browser navigation or by inspecting the application's route definitions in the source code if accessible.Affected if The legacy dashboard route responds successfully and returns project data without proper authorization checks
-
Verify project-level authorization is enforcedAs an authenticated team member belonging to Project A, attempt to access or query data from Project B through the API. Inspect whether the application correctly denies access to projects outside the user's authorized scope.Affected if Authenticated users can retrieve data or report passwords from projects they are not members of, indicating the authorization bypass is present
-
Check raw project object response for sensitive data exposureMake an authenticated API request to the legacy route and examine the response payload. Look for any password fields, credentials, or sensitive data embedded in the raw project object that should not be exposed to the requesting user.Affected if The API response includes stored report passwords or other sensitive credentials in plaintext within the project object
A user is affected if running Chartbrew 4.9.0 (or any pre-5.0.0 version) with the legacy dashboard route enabled, and an authenticated user can access data or credentials from projects they are not authorized to view.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Chartbrew to version 5.0.0 which patches the authorization bypass. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict legacy route access at the API gateway or web server level.
5.0.0
- Identify the currently running Chartbrew version using the application's admin interface or deployment configuration
- Backup the existing Chartbrew database and configuration files
- Upgrade Chartbrew to version 5.0.0 or later by following the official upgrade documentation at https://chartbrew.com
- After upgrading, verify that the legacy dashboard route no longer exposes project data to unauthorized team members
- Confirm that users can only access project data for projects they have explicit permission to view
- Test with a low-privileged team member account to ensure the authorization bypass is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40603 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40603 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data