CVE-2026-4067
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Ad Short plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'ad' shortcode's 'client' attribute in all versions up to and including 2.0.1. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the 'client' shortcode attribute. The ad_func() shortcode handler at line 71 accepts a 'client' attribute via shortcode_atts() and directly concatenates it into a double-quoted HTML attribute (data-ad-client) at line 130 without applying esc_attr() or any other sanitization. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Ad Short WordPress plugin (versions up to 2.0.1) is vulnerable to stored XSS via the 'client' attribute in the [ad] shortcode. The ad_func() handler accepts the client parameter and directly outputs it into a data-ad-client HTML attribute without sanitization (missing esc_attr()), allowing authenticated contributors+ to inject arbitrary JavaScript.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Ad Short plugin installationIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Ad Short' or check the plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/ad-short/) for the plugin folderAffected if The Ad Short plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Determine installed plugin versionCheck the plugin main PHP file header (usually ad-short.php in the plugin directory) for the 'Version' comment, or view the plugin details in WordPress admin Plugins pageAffected if Version is 2.0.1 or lower (any version up to and including 2.0.1)
-
Locate the vulnerable ad_func functionOpen the main plugin PHP file and search for the function named 'ad_func' or 'ad_shortcode', then locate where the 'client' parameter is handled around line 130Affected if The function exists and processes a 'client' parameter from shortcode attributes
-
Check for missing esc_attr sanitizationIn the ad_func function, find where the client value is output into a data-ad-client HTML attribute (look for data-ad-client=), then verify whether esc_attr() is wrapped around the client valueAffected if The client parameter is output directly without esc_attr() sanitization (e.g., data-ad-client="$client" instead of data-ad-client="esc_attr($client)")
-
Detect if vulnerable shortcodes are in useSearch WordPress database (wp_posts table) or content files for [ad shortcode usage with a client attribute, e.g., [ad client="..."]Affected if Any [ad] shortcode with a client attribute exists in posts, pages, or widgets
-
Check for contributor-level or higher user accountsReview WordPress user roles at Users > All Users to identify any users with Contributor, Author, Editor, or Administrator rolesAffected if Users with Contributor or higher privileges exist who could create or edit content containing the malicious shortcode
The environment is affected if the Ad Short plugin version 2.0.1 or lower is installed AND the client attribute in [ad] shortcodes is output without esc_attr() sanitization in the ad_func function, allowing stored XSS injection by authenticated users with Contributor access or higher.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply esc_attr() to the 'client' attribute before output in the ad_func() function at line 130, and update to version 2.0.2 or later when available.
Ad Short plugin version 2.0.2 or latest available version
- 1. Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard
- 2. Go to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 3. Locate the 'Ad Short' plugin
- 4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to install the latest version
- 5. After updating, verify the 'client' attribute in any 'ad' shortcodes uses properly sanitized values or remove/regenerate shortcodes that may have been injected with malicious scripts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4067 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4067 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data