CVE-2026-40703
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the dashboard of the BIG-IP Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Configuration utility's dashboard, allowing an attacker to potentially trick an authenticated administrator into performing unintended administrative actions via maliciously crafted requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the F5 BIG-IP product and versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or 'bigpipe version' to retrieve the installed BIG-IP versionAffected if The installed version falls within 17.1.0-17.1.3, 17.5.0-17.5.1, or 16.1.0-16.1.6
-
Confirm the Configuration utility is accessibleCheck if the BIG-IP Configuration utility (web-based management interface) is exposed and reachable on the management IP or a self IPAffected if The Configuration utility is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS and the version is within the affected ranges
-
Verify administrative access is enabledCheck via 'tmsh list auth user admin' or by confirming active admin sessions exist in the Configuration utilityAffected if Administrative users can log into the Configuration utility and the version is within affected ranges
-
Check for CSRF protection configurationReview the Configuration utility settings or proxy configuration for existing CSRF token enforcement. This typically requires access to F5 support or examining HTTP response headers for SameSite cookie attributesAffected if The version is within affected ranges and no SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax cookie attributes are enforced on session cookies
A user is affected if they are running any of the listed F5 BIG-IP modules (APM, AFM, ASM, Analytics, AAM, AVR, Automation Toolchain) within version ranges 17.1.0-17.1.3, 17.5.0-17.5.1, or 16.1.0-16.1.6 AND the Configuration utility is accessible to authenticated administrators.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided patch when released. Until then, administrators should avoid clicking untrusted links while logged into the Configuration utility and consider implementing additional session controls.
Upgrade to versions beyond 17.1.3 (e.g., 17.1.4+), beyond 17.5.1 (e.g., 17.5.2+), or beyond 16.1.6 (e.g., 16.1.7+) - consult my.f5.com for exact fixed releases
- 1. Identify the current BIG-IP version by navigating to System > Software Management > ISO Image or checking the version displayed in the BIG-IP Configuration utility
- 2. Determine which version branch is currently deployed (16.1.x, 17.1.x, or 17.5.x)
- 3. Access the F5 Downloads page at https://downloads.f5.com/ or log in to my.f5.com to obtain the latest available version for your branch
- 4. Download the appropriate hotfix or upgrade ISO for your version branch that addresses CVE-2026-40703
- 5. Follow F5 upgrade documentation to upload and install the new version using UCSR or manual ISO installation
- 6. After upgrade, verify the BIG-IP Configuration utility is accessible and functional
- 7. Test the dashboard functionality to confirm the CSRF protection is working properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40703 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40703 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data