CVE-2026-4077
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Ecover Builder For Dummies plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'id' parameter of the 'ecover' shortcode in all versions up to and including 1.0. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the user-supplied 'id' shortcode attribute. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Ecover Builder For Dummies WordPress plugin fails to sanitize the 'id' attribute of its 'ecover' shortcode and does not escape output when rendering this attribute, allowing stored XSS injection. An authenticated attacker with Contributor-level permissions can insert malicious JavaScript via the shortcode that executes when other users view affected pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the plugin is installedCheck the WordPress plugins directory orwp-content/plugins/ for a folder named 'ecover-builder-for-dummies' or similar. In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Ecover Builder For Dummies'.Affected if The plugin is installed and active in WordPress
-
Identify the installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins > Ecover Builder For Dummies and view the version number displayed. Alternatively, check the main plugin PHP file header for 'Version:' comment.Affected if The installed version has not yet received the patch for proper input sanitization (compare your version against any later releases that address this issue)
-
Detect usage of the ecover shortcode in contentQuery the WordPress database: SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE post_content LIKE '%[ecover%' AND post_status IN ('publish','future','draft'); Adjust wp_ prefix if your installation uses a different table prefix.Affected if The shortcode is present in published content, allowing injected scripts to execute when users view those pages
-
Check for unescaped id attribute renderingTemporarily create a test page with [ecover id='"><script>alert(1)</script>'] shortcode and view the page source. Search for the literal script tags or unescaped quotes in the rendered HTML output.Affected if The id parameter value appears unescaped in the HTML output (you see > or < characters rather than > or <)
-
Identify users with Contributor-level accessIn WordPress admin, go to Users and review the Role column. Contributors can create posts but cannot publish without approval. Query: SELECT user_id, meta_value FROM wp_usermeta WHERE meta_key = 'wp_capabilities' AND meta_value LIKE '%contributor%';Affected if One or more Contributor-level users exist, meaning they have permission to insert the malicious shortcode
Your environment is affected if the Ecover Builder For Dummies plugin is installed, the ecover shortcode is used in published content, and users with Contributor or higher roles exist who could inject the unsanitized id attribute.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the latest version of the plugin which implements proper input sanitization and output escaping for the 'id' shortcode parameter. Until a patch is available, restrict shortcode usage permissions to trusted roles.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4077 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4077 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data