SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2026-40811

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the ssoabstractservice due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit a SQL Injection vulnerability in the ssoabstractservice component. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special elements used in SQL SELECT commands, allowing attackers to inject malicious SQL statements. Successful exploitation grants total confidentiality loss by enabling extraction of sensitive data from the database.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) to properly neutralize special characters in all SQL SELECT statements within the ssoabstractservice. Additionally, apply input validation and principle of least privilege on database accounts used by the service.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ssoabstractservice component presence
    Search the application codebase, dependencies, or deployed artifacts for files, modules, or services named 'ssoabstractservice' or containing this string in configuration files, logs, or documentation.
    Affected if The component is present in the environment and handles authentication-related functionality.
  2. Determine if the service is network-accessible
    Review network configuration, firewall rules, or API gateway settings to check whether the ssoabstractservice endpoint is exposed to unauthenticated network access from external sources.
    Affected if The service endpoint is reachable without authentication over the network.
  3. Identify input sources reaching the component
    Examine the ssoabstractservice code or configuration to trace how user-supplied data (such as HTTP parameters, headers, cookies, or URL paths) flows into the component and potentially reaches database query logic.
    Affected if User-controlled input can be passed to the component without sanitization.
  4. Inspect SQL query implementation for direct string concatenation
    Review the source code of ssoabstractservice to locate SQL SELECT statements and verify whether parameters are concatenated directly into query strings instead of using parameterized queries or prepared statements.
    Affected if SQL SELECT statements construct queries by concatenating user input or untrusted variables without using parameterized queries.
  5. Test for SQL injection vulnerability
    If permitted by security assessment policies, send crafted input containing SQL special characters (such as single quotes, UNION statements, or comment syntax) to the ssoabstractservice endpoint and observe whether database errors are returned or the response differs from expected behavior.
    Affected if The component returns database error messages, exhibits unexpected behavior, or allows extraction of data that should not be accessible based on the injected SQL syntax.

A user is affected if the ssoabstractservice component is present, network-accessible without authentication, and processes user input into SQL SELECT statements without parameterized queries.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries (prepared statements) to properly neutralize special characters in all SQL SELECT statements within the ssoabstractservice. Additionally, apply input validation and principle of least privilege on database accounts used by the service.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,820
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40811 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40811 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data