SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2026-40812

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getLiveValues functions sn parameter due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit a SQL Injection vulnerability in the getLiveValues function's 'sn' parameter due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This allows arbitrary SQL code execution leading to total loss of confidentiality.

MitigationReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements to properly neutralize special characters in user input, and implement input validation for the 'sn' parameter.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the application using getLiveValues
    Search your codebase or deployed web application for the 'getLiveValues' function definition. Review application architecture documentation or source code to determine which product/component contains this function.
    Affected if Your deployed software includes a getLiveValues function that processes the 'sn' parameter in a SQL query.
  2. Determine if getLiveValues is exposed via web/API
    Review your web server logs, API endpoint documentation, or application routing configuration to identify if getLiveValues is accessible through HTTP/HTTPS endpoints. Check for routes, handlers, or controllers that invoke this function.
    Affected if The getLiveValues function is accessible as a web service endpoint or API that accepts external requests.
  3. Inspect the 'sn' parameter handling
    Examine the source code for getLiveValues to see how the 'sn' parameter is processed. Look for direct insertion of the 'sn' parameter value into SQL query strings without using parameterized queries, prepared statements, or proper escaping.
    Affected if The 'sn' parameter is concatenated directly into a SQL SELECT statement without parameterized binding or input validation.
  4. Verify input validation on 'sn'
    Search the codebase for validation routines, allowlist checks, or sanitization functions applied to the 'sn' parameter before its use in database queries. Check if type checking, length limits, or pattern matching is enforced.
    Affected if No input validation, type checking, or allowlist constraints are applied to the 'sn' parameter before database execution.
  5. Check for dynamic SQL usage
    Review the getLiveValues function code to determine if SQL queries are constructed using string concatenation or string formatting with user input rather than parameterized queries or an ORM with proper query building.
    Affected if The application builds SQL queries dynamically using string concatenation with the 'sn' parameter value.

You are affected if your environment runs software containing the getLiveValues function with the 'sn' parameter that is exposed to untrusted input and processes it via dynamic SQL without validation or parameterized queries.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements to properly neutralize special characters in user input, and implement input validation for the 'sn' parameter.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40812 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40812 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data