SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2026-40817

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getAlarmProfiles function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the getAlarmProfiles function where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being used in a SQL SELECT query. An attacker can inject malicious SQL commands via input parameters to this function, potentially extracting sensitive data from the database.

MitigationReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the getAlarmProfiles function to properly neutralize special elements. Input validation and least-privilege database accounts should also be implemented as defense-in-depth measures.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the getAlarmProfiles function in your codebase
    Search your application source code for the string 'getAlarmProfiles' - this may be in a controller, service, or data access layer file. Identify the file and programming language used.
    Affected if The function exists in your application code and handles user input without sanitization
  2. Examine how user input is handled in the function
    Review the getAlarmProfiles function code to trace how parameters (query parameters, request body, headers) flow into the function. Look for any input parameters it accepts.
    Affected if User-supplied parameters are directly passed into the function without validation or sanitization
  3. Inspect the SQL query construction within getAlarmProfiles
    Find where SQL SELECT queries are built inside getAlarmProfiles. Look for string concatenation, string formatting, or dynamic query building that incorporates input parameters.
    Affected if The SQL query is constructed using string concatenation or formatting with user input rather than parameterized queries
  4. Verify if prepared statements or parameterized queries are used
    Check the database interaction code within getAlarmProfiles for use of prepared statements, parameterized queries, ORMs, or query builders that separate code from data.
    Affected if The code does NOT use prepared statements or parameterized queries - raw SQL with string interpolation is used instead
  5. Confirm the function is accessible without authentication
    Review your routing, middleware, and access control configuration to determine if the getAlarmProfiles function can be invoked by unauthenticated users (no login required).
    Affected if The function endpoint is publicly accessible or accessible to unauthenticated users

Your environment is affected if the getAlarmProfiles function exists in your application, accepts user input, and constructs SQL queries using string concatenation or formatting instead of parameterized queries, and is accessible without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the getAlarmProfiles function to properly neutralize special elements. Input validation and least-privilege database accounts should also be implemented as defense-in-depth measures.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40817 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40817 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data