SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2026-40832

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An low privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getDevicegroups function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability exists in the getDevicegroups function where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL SELECT queries. A remote, low-privileged attacker can exploit this to inject malicious SQL code, potentially exfiltrating sensitive data from the database.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database queries in the getDevicegroups function, and apply proper input validation to neutralize special SQL characters.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the getDevicegroups function in the codebase
    Search the application source code for 'getDevicegroups' function definition - check in controller, service, or model files depending on application architecture
    Affected if The function exists in the application code
  2. Identify how user input reaches this function
    Trace the code path from HTTP request parameters to the getDevicegroups function call; look for how devicegroup-related parameters (such as id, name, filter, or search criteria) are passed
    Affected if User-supplied parameters (GET/POST/cookies) are directly passed to this function without validation
  3. Verify if the function is accessible without authentication
    Check the route/controller security annotations or middleware for getDevicegroups endpoint; attempt to call the endpoint without providing valid authentication credentials
    Affected if The endpoint can be reached without any authentication or authorization checks
  4. Inspect SQL query construction within getDevicegroups
    Review the database query code inside getDevicegroups function; look for string concatenation, template literals, or dynamic query building that incorporates user input directly into SQL statements
    Affected if SQL queries are constructed using string concatenation or interpolation with unsanitized user input rather than parameterized queries or an ORM with proper escaping
  5. Confirm absence of input sanitization
    Search for input validation routines (such as escaping special characters, using allowlists, or applying type coercion) applied to parameters before they are used in SQL queries within this function
    Affected if No input sanitization, escaping, or validation is performed on user input before it is used in database queries

If the getDevicegroups function exists, accepts unauthenticated user input, and uses that input directly in SQL queries without parameterized statements or input sanitization, the application is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database queries in the getDevicegroups function, and apply proper input validation to neutralize special SQL characters.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40832 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40832 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data