SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2026-40840

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An low privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the VerifyCreateLicences function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability exists in the VerifyCreateLicences function due to improper neutralization of special elements in SQL SELECT commands. A low-privileged remote attacker can exploit this to read sensitive data from the database, resulting in total loss of confidentiality.

MitigationReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the VerifyCreateLicences function to properly neutralize special characters and prevent SQL injection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the VerifyCreateLicences function in your codebase
    Search your application source code or binary files for the string 'VerifyCreateLicences' - check both frontend and backend components, including any shared libraries or DLLs that may contain this function
    Affected if This function exists in your deployed software version
  2. Verify if the function is exposed as a network-accessible endpoint
    Review your web server, API gateway, or service configuration files to determine if VerifyCreateLicences is mapped to a URL route, web service endpoint, or API handler that accepts incoming network requests
    Affected if The function is exposed over the network (HTTP, REST, SOAP, or similar protocol)
  3. Confirm the function accepts user-supplied input
    Examine the function signature and code to identify parameters that accept external input (query parameters, form fields, JSON body fields, headers, or cookies)
    Affected if The function processes any input that could be controlled by an unauthenticated remote attacker
  4. Inspect SQL query construction in the function
    Review the function source code or decompiled code to identify SELECT queries. Check whether user-supplied input is concatenated directly into SQL strings without using parameterized queries, prepared statements, or input sanitization
    Affected if The function builds SQL SELECT queries by concatenating or interpolating raw user input into the query string
  5. Check if authentication is enforced on the exposed endpoint
    Review your access control configuration, middleware, or authentication layer to verify whether requests to the VerifyCreateLicences endpoint require valid authentication credentials before processing
    Affected if The endpoint can be accessed without any authentication (anonymous access allowed)

You are affected if your software contains the VerifyCreateLicences function, it is network-accessible without authentication, and it constructs SQL SELECT queries using unsanitized user input.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the VerifyCreateLicences function to properly neutralize special characters and prevent SQL injection.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,110
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40840 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40840 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data