SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2026-40841

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An low privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getProjectTags function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the getProjectTags function where user-supplied input is not properly neutralized before being used in a SQL SELECT query. An unauthenticated remote attacker with low privileges can inject malicious SQL commands to exfiltrate sensitive data from the database, resulting in complete loss of confidentiality.

MitigationReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) to ensure proper neutralization of special characters, and implement input validation on all user-supplied parameters before they are used in database queries.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the application containing getProjectTags
    Search your codebase or enumerate installed software for the getProjectTags function definition. This may be in a web application, API endpoint, or backend service.
    Affected if The function exists in your environment and handles user-supplied parameters
  2. Determine the product version
    Check the installed version of the software that contains getProjectTags. Compare against any available version information or release notes.
    Affected if The installed version is older than any patched release (if available) or matches the vulnerable version range
  3. Verify the vulnerable code path exists
    Inspect the getProjectTags function source code. Look for SQL SELECT queries that incorporate user-supplied input (request parameters, query string values, headers) without using parameterized queries or proper escaping.
    Affected if The function constructs SQL queries using string concatenation or string formatting with raw user input
  4. Confirm the function is accessible to unauthenticated or low-privilege users
    Test accessing the getProjectTags endpoint/function without authentication or with a low-privilege account. Check authentication and authorization controls on the affected route.
    Affected if The function can be invoked without proper authentication or by users with low privileges
  5. Check for input validation or sanitization
    Review the code preceding the SQL query in getProjectTags. Look for input validation routines, allowlist checks, or sanitization functions applied to user parameters before database interaction.
    Affected if No input validation, allowlisting, or sanitization is performed on user input used in the SQL query

If the getProjectTags function exists in your environment and uses user-supplied input directly in SQL SELECT queries without parameterized queries, input validation, or proper sanitization, your environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) to ensure proper neutralization of special characters, and implement input validation on all user-supplied parameters before they are used in database queries.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40841 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40841 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data