CVE-2026-4096
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM DevOps Plan 3.0.0 through 3.0.6 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM DevOps Plan versions 3.0.0 through 3.0.6 fails to properly validate HOST header input, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers. This can lead to XSS attacks via header reflection, cache poisoning where malicious content gets cached, and session hijacking through cookie manipulation or header-based session fixation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM DevOps Plan versionLocate the version information for your IBM DevOps Plan installation. This is typically found in the product's about page, installation directory, or by querying the product's built-in version endpoint if available. Common locations include the installation root folder or the administration console.Affected if The installed version is 3.0.0 through 3.0.6 (any version >= 3.0.0 but < 3.0.7)
-
Confirm the application accepts HTTP/HTTPS connectionsVerify that the IBM DevOps Plan web interface or API is accessible over HTTP or HTTPS. Check your network configuration, reverse proxy settings, or firewall rules to confirm the product is exposed as a web service.Affected if The product is running and accepting HTTP/HTTPS requests where it processes incoming HOST headers
-
Test for HOST header injection vulnerabilitySend a crafted HTTP request to the IBM DevOps Plan endpoint with a manipulated HOST header (e.g., HOST: example.com%0D%0AX-Injected-Header: value) and observe whether the injected header is reflected in the response or processed by the server.Affected if The server accepts and processes the manipulated HOST header without validation, allowing header injection
-
Review HTTP request handling configurationExamine the IBM DevOps Plan configuration files or web server settings to determine how HOST headers are processed. Look for any proxy or middleware configurations that pass HOST headers to the backend without sanitization.Affected if The configuration allows raw HOST header values to be passed through to the application without validation
Your environment is affected if IBM DevOps Plan version 3.0.0-3.0.6 is installed and the web interface is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS, allowing unvalidated HOST headers to be processed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.0.7
Implement strict validation and sanitization of the HOST header server-side, using an allowlist of permitted values and normalizing/canonicalizing the header before use. Additionally, configure the application server to reject requests with unexpected HOST values.
IBM DevOps Plan 3.0.7
- 1. Plan an upgrade window for the IBM DevOps Plan installation
- 2. Back up the current IBM DevOps Plan installation, including configuration files and data
- 3. Upgrade IBM DevOps Plan from version 3.0.0-3.0.6 to version 3.0.7 or later
- 4. After the upgrade, verify the installation was successful and all services are running
- 5. Test that the HOST header handling works correctly and the HTTP header injection vulnerability is resolved
- 6. Monitor IBM security advisories for any subsequent security updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4096 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4096 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data