CVE-2026-41089
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in Windows Netlogon allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Windows Netlogon service allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on affected Windows systems. The flaw exists in the Netlogon RPC interface used for domain controller authentication and communication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2< 10.0.14393.9140< 10.0.17763.8755< 10.0.20348.5074< 10.0.25398.2330< 10.0.26100.32772CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows Server versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to determine the installed Windows Server versionAffected if The version falls within the affected ranges: Server 2012 (all versions), 2016 < 10.0.14393.9140, 2019 < 10.0.17763.8755, 2022 < 10.0.20348.5074, 2022 23h2 < 10.0.25398.2330, or 2025 < 10.0.26100.32772
-
Verify Netlogon service statusRun 'Get-Service -Name Netlogon' in PowerShell or check Services.msc for the Netlogon serviceAffected if The Netlogon service is running or set to start automatically (vulnerability only applies if Netlogon is enabled)
-
Check Netlogon RPC listener configurationRun 'netsh rpc show all' or use 'netstat -an | findstr "135 445"' to check if RPC endpoints are listeningAffected if Netlogon RPC interfaces are exposed on network listeners (the flaw is in the Netlogon RPC interface)
-
Determine if system is a domain controllerRun 'Get-ADDomain' (if AD DS is installed) or check System Properties for 'Domain:' designationAffected if The server is a domain controller, as Netlogon is primarily used for DC authentication and communication
You are affected if your Windows Server version is within the affected ranges AND the Netlogon service is running and exposed via RPC on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.914010.0.17763.875510.0.20348.5074
Apply the relevant Microsoft security update for Windows Netlogon immediately. Restrict Netlogon RPC exposure to internal networks and disable NTLM authentication where possible to reduce attack surface.
Windows Server 2016 build 10.0.14393.9140+ | Windows Server 2019 build 10.0.17763.8755+ | Windows Server 2022 build 10.0.20348.5074+ | Windows Server 2022 23h2 build 10.0.25398.2330+ | Windows Server 2025 build 10.0.26100.32772+
- Identify the current Windows Server version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo'
- For Windows Server 2016: Upgrade to build 10.0.14393.9140 or later
- For Windows Server 2019: Upgrade to build 10.0.17763.8755 or later
- For Windows Server 2022: Upgrade to build 10.0.20348.5074 or later
- For Windows Server 2022 23h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.25398.2330 or later
- For Windows Server 2025: Upgrade to build 10.0.26100.32772 or later
- For Windows Server 2012/2012 R2: These versions are end-of-support and do not receive security updates; migrate to a supported Windows Server version
- Apply the upgrade via Windows Update, WSUS, or download the latest ISO from Microsoft Volume Licensing Service Center
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41089 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41089 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data