CVE-2026-4117
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe CalJ plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authorization in all versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to a missing capability check in the CalJSettingsPage class constructor, which processes the 'save-obtained-key' operation directly from POST data without verifying that the requesting user has the 'manage_options' capability, and without any nonce verification. The plugin bootstrap file (calj.php) instantiates CalJSettingsPage whenever is_admin() returns true, which is the case for any authenticated user making requests to wp-admin URLs (including admin-ajax.php). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify the plugin's API key setting and clear the Shabbat cache, effectively taking control of the plugin's API integration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe CalJ WordPress plugin lacks authorization checks in its settings page class constructor, allowing any authenticated user (Subscriber-level or higher) to modify the plugin's API key and clear caches via the 'save-obtained-key' operation. The vulnerability stems from direct POST data processing without capability verification ('manage_options') or nonce validation, and the plugin auto-instantiates the settings class for all admin requests including admin-ajax.php.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm CalJ plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins and verify the CalJ plugin appears in the installed plugins listAffected if CalJ plugin is present and active in the WordPress installation
-
Identify plugin versionIn the Plugins list, locate the CalJ plugin and note the version number displayed beneath the plugin nameAffected if version cannot be verified or is earlier than any patched release
-
Verify current user role permissionsCheck if your current WordPress user account has only Subscriber-level or higher privileges (not Administrator), then attempt to access wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with a POST request containing the 'save-obtained-key' actionAffected if the request processes successfully without returning a permission denied error - indicating the plugin accepts the operation from lower-privileged users
-
Inspect plugin settings class instantiationExamine the CalJ plugin source code (typically in includes/ or classes/ directory) for the CalJSettingsPage class constructor - look for missing current_user_can() or nonce verification checks before processing POST data for the 'save-obtained-key' operationAffected if the code shows direct POST data processing without capability checks (manage_options) or nonce validation in the constructor or save method
-
Test API key modification capabilityAs a non-admin user (Subscriber role), submit a crafted POST request to admin-ajax.php with action=save-obtained-key and parameter data (such as a dummy API key) to see if the plugin accepts and saves the valueAffected if the plugin accepts and saves the API key modification without rejecting the request based on user privilege level
If the CalJ plugin is installed and any authenticated user with Subscriber-level access can modify the plugin's API key or clear caches via the save-obtained-key operation without admin privileges, the environment is affected by this authorization bypass vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataAdd a capability check requiring 'manage_options' and implement nonce verification before processing the 'save-obtained-key' operation. Gate the CalJSettingsPage instantiation to only trigger for users with appropriate privileges.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4117 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4117 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data