CVE-2026-41195
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedmosparo is the modern solution to protect your online forms from spam. Prior to 1.4.13, the automatic rule package source URL feature allows a project member with the editor role to store an attacker-controlled URL that the server later fetches. Because the server follows http/https redirects and does not restrict private or loopback destinations, this becomes a stored SSRF primitive that can be turned into an internal HTTP probing oracle. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.13.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe automatic rule package source URL feature in mosparo prior to 1.4.13 allows authenticated users with the editor role to store arbitrary URLs that the server subsequently fetches. Because the server follows HTTP/HTTPS redirects without restricting private or loopback destinations, this creates a stored SSRF primitive enabling internal network reconnaissance and service probing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine mosparo installed versionLocate the version file or check the admin dashboard for the current mosparo version numberAffected if The installed version is lower than 1.4.13 (e.g., 1.4.12, 1.4.0, etc.)
-
Verify automatic rule package source URL feature is enabledNavigate to Settings > Rule Packages in the mosparo admin interface and check if a rule package source URL is configured under the automatic update sectionAffected if The automatic rule package source URL feature is turned on and pointing to a URL
-
Identify editor role usersCheck the user management section of mosparo admin for accounts assigned the editor roleAffected if There are one or more users with editor role permissions who could configure rule package URLs
-
Inspect configured rule package URLsReview all rule package configurations for stored URLs, particularly looking for internal or non-public destinations in the source URL fieldAffected if Any rule package source URLs point to internal network addresses (127.0.0.1, 192.168.x.x, 10.x.x.x, etc.) or private IP ranges
-
Review server access logs for SSRF indicatorsExamine web server access logs for requests from the mosparo server to internal IP addresses or loopback addresses that were triggered by rule package fetchesAffected if Logs show HTTP requests from the server to private/loopback addresses originating from rule package URL fetching
You are affected if mosparo version is below 1.4.13 AND the automatic rule package source URL feature is enabled with a configured URL that could be abused for internal network probing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to mosparo version 1.4.13 which implements proper URL destination validation and restricts following redirects to untrusted/internal addresses.
1.4.13
- 1. Check the current installed version of mosparo (typically via admin dashboard or command line: bin/console mosparo:version)
- 2. Create a complete backup of the mosparo database and configuration files
- 3. Upgrade mosparo to version 1.4.13 or later using your installation method (e.g., Composer, Docker, or manual download)
- 4. After upgrade, verify the version is 1.4.13 or higher
- 5. As an additional hardening measure, consider configuring network restrictions to prevent the web server from making arbitrary outbound HTTP/HTTPS requests to internal/private network ranges (RFC 1918 addresses and loopback addresses)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41195 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41195 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data