CVE-2026-41227
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn an HTTP/2 virtual server with Layer 7 DoS Protection configured, undisclosed traffic can result in an increase in memory consumption causing the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP where specific undisclosed traffic sent to an HTTP/2 virtual server with Layer 7 DoS Protection enabled causes excessive memory consumption, leading to the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) process to crash and terminate.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed BIG-IP product moduleRun the appropriate command to list installed F5 modules (such as tmsh show module or the system GUI module summary). Confirm the system is running one of: Advanced Web Application Firewall, Application Security Manager, or DDoS Hybrid Defender.Affected if The system is running any of these three modules.
-
Check the BIG-IP software versionRun the command to display the installed BIG-IP version (such as tmsh show version or tmsh show sys version). Compare the version number against the affected ranges: 17.1.0 through 17.1.3, 17.5.0 through 17.5.1, or 16.1.0 through 16.1.6.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges.
-
Identify HTTP/2 enabled virtual serversList the virtual servers configured on the BIG-IP system (such as tmsh list ltm virtual or via the Configuration utility). Identify which virtual servers have HTTP/2 protocol enabled.Affected if Any virtual server is configured to accept HTTP/2 traffic.
-
Verify Layer 7 DoS Protection is enabledExamine the virtual servers identified in the previous step. Check whether Layer 7 DoS Protection (also known as DoS Protection Profile or Application DoS) is attached or enabled on those HTTP/2 virtual servers.Affected if Layer 7 DoS Protection is enabled on any HTTP/2 virtual server.
The system is affected if it runs one of the three modules, falls within the specified version ranges, has an HTTP/2 virtual server, AND has Layer 7 DoS Protection enabled on that virtual server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a fixed version once available. Until then, consider disabling Layer 7 DoS Protection on affected virtual servers or implementing additional upstream filtering.
Upgrade to BIG-IP 17.5.2 or later (or the latest 17.x stable release)
- 1. Log in to the F5 management console (TMUI) or use BIG-IP TMSH.
- 2. Identify all virtual servers using HTTP/2 with Layer 7 DoS Protection enabled.
- 3. Verify current BIG-IP version by running: tmsh show /sys version
- 4. If version is within affected ranges (16.1.0-16.1.6, 17.1.0-17.1.3, or 17.5.0-17.5.1), plan for upgrade.
- 5. Back up current configuration using: tmsh save /sys config all-partitions
- 6. Download the appropriate hotfix or upgrade ISO from F5 Networks support portal (my.f5.com).
- 7. Upload and install the hotfix/upgrade following F5 deployment documentation.
- 8. After upgrade, verify the TMM process stability and monitor memory consumption.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41227 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41227 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data