CVE-2026-41234
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFroxlor is open source server administration software. Prior to version 2.3.7, the `DomainZones.add` API endpoint does not sanitize newline characters in TXT record content. An authenticated customer with DNS editing enabled can inject newlines into TXT record values, which break out of the record line in the generated BIND zone file. This enables injection of arbitrary BIND directives (`$INCLUDE`, `$GENERATE`) and arbitrary DNS records (A, MX, CNAME) into the zone file written to disk by the DNS rebuild cron. This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-30932 (GHSA-x6w6-2xwp-3jh6), which patched the same newline injection for LOC, RP, SSHFP, and TLSA record types but did not patch TXT records. Version 2.3.7 contains an updated patch.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFroxlor's DomainZones.add API endpoint fails to sanitize newline characters in TXT record content, allowing authenticated customers with DNS editing permissions to inject newlines that break out of the TXT record line in generated BIND zone files. This enables injection of arbitrary BIND directives ($INCLUDE, $GENERATE) and DNS records (A, MX, CNAME) into the zone file. This is an incomplete fix from CVE-2026-30932 which patched LOC, RP, SSHFP, and TLSA but not TXT records.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Froxlor is installedLook for Froxlor installation directory (commonly /var/www/html/froxlor or /usr/share/froxlor) or check for froxlor package via package manager (dpkg -l | grep froxlor, rpm -qa | grep froxlor)Affected if Froxlor is installed on the system
-
Identify installed Froxlor versionCheck version file typically located at include/version.php or VERSION file in Froxlor root directory, or check admin panel footer for version numberAffected if Version is lower than 2.3.7 (e.g., 2.3.6, 2.3.5, etc.)
-
Verify DomainZones.add API endpoint existsLocate API routing configuration (usually in lib/API/ or api/ directory) and check for DomainZones.add or DomainZones::add method handlingAffected if API endpoint exists and is accessible without additional authentication beyond basic user login
-
Check if DNS zone management is enabledExamine Froxlor configuration for enabled modules (typically in settings like dnsenabled, or check if DNS module is activated in the admin panel under System > Settings > DNS)Affected if DNS module is enabled and users have access to create/edit TXT records
-
Inspect BIND zone files for injected contentCheck generated zone files in /etc/bind/, /var/lib/bind/, or Froxlor's zone file output directory for unexpected $INCLUDE, $GENERATE directives or additional A, MX, CNAME records not created through normal Froxlor interfaceAffected if Zone files contain unexpected records or directives with malformed TXT record content preceding them
User is affected if running Froxlor version lower than 2.3.7 with DNS module enabled and the DomainZones.add API accessible to users with DNS editing privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Froxlor version 2.3.7 or later which contains the complete patch for newline injection across all record types including TXT records.
Froxlor version 2.3.7
- 1. Identify the currently installed Froxlor version by checking the version file or admin interface.
- 2. Backup the Froxlor installation directory and database before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 3. Download Froxlor version 2.3.7 from the official repository or source.
- 4. Extract and install the new version, overwriting existing files while preserving configuration.
- 5. Run any provided database migration scripts included in the 2.3.7 release.
- 6. Clear any caches and verify the DNS rebuild cron functions correctly.
- 7. Test that TXT record creation via the DomainZones.add API endpoint properly sanitizes newline characters.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41234 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41234 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data