CVE-2026-41241
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedpretalx is a conference planning tool. Prior to 2026.1.0, The organiser search in the pretalx backend rendered submission titles, speaker display names, and user names/emails into the result dropdown using innerHTML string interpolation. Any user who controls one of those fields (which includes any registered user whose display name is looked up by an administrator) could include HTML or JavaScript that would execute in an organiser's browser when the organiser's search query matched the malicious record. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencepretalx versions prior to 2026.1.0 contain a stored XSS vulnerability in the backend organizer search function. User-controlled fields (submission titles, speaker display names, and user names/emails) are rendered into search result dropdowns using innerHTML string interpolation without sanitization, allowing injected HTML/JavaScript to execute in an organizer's browser when their search query matches the malicious record.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed pretalx versionLocate the pretalx version by checking the installation documentation, running 'pip show pretalx', or inspecting the version file in the pretalx installation directory. Compare the version number to the affected range of < 2026.1.0.Affected if The installed version is any release prior to 2026.1.0 (e.g., 2025.x.x or earlier).
-
Verify organizer access to backendConfirm that your user account has organizer-level permissions in pretalx, allowing access to the backend search functionality used by event organizers.Affected if You have organizer or superuser access to the pretalx backend.
-
Identify user-controlled content in the systemCheck the database or content management interface for records containing user-supplied data in the following fields: submission titles, speaker display names, and user names/emails. These fields are the injection points for the stored XSS.Affected if The pretalx instance contains any submissions, speakers, or user accounts with custom-supplied data in the affected fields.
-
Test organizer search for XSS payload executionAs an organizer, use the backend search function and query for a record containing a test XSS payload (e.g., <script>alert(1)</script>) in a submission title, speaker display name, or user field. Inspect the search result dropdown in the browser developer console to see if the payload renders as raw HTML rather than being escaped.Affected if The search results render unescaped HTML/JavaScript from user-supplied fields, indicating the innerHTML vulnerability is present.
You are affected if your pretalx installation version is below 2026.1.0 AND you have organizer access to the backend AND your instance contains user-supplied content in submission titles, speaker names, or user profiles that could be rendered in search results.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.1.0
Upgrade to pretalx 2026.1.0 or later, which implements proper output encoding/sanitization for the organizer search results. Additionally, audit other areas of the application for similar innerHTML patterns that may not be sanitizing user-supplied content.
pretalx 2026.1.0
- 1. Backup your current pretalx installation and database before upgrading.
- 2. Upgrade pretalx to version 2026.1.0 or later using your deployment method (pip, docker, or package manager).
- 3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the pretalx version number.
- 4. Test the organiser search functionality in the backend to confirm the XSS vulnerability is patched.
- 5. Ensure any registered users cannot inject malicious HTML/JavaScript through their display names, submission titles, or speaker profiles.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41241 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41241 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data