CVE-2026-41255
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCKAN is an open-source DMS (data management system) for powering data hubs and data portals. Prior to 2.10.10 and 2.11.5, Access to the views via tokens or unauthenticated requests marked the endpoint as not requiring CSRF protection. The marking was a member variable in flask-wtf.csrf.CSRFProtect(), which was stored as a module level variable in the flask_app middleware. This API was never intended for request level changes, it is primarily a decorator for static configuration. An unauthenticated request could hit a protected endpoint, exempting it from CSRF protection for the life of the particular server process. (e.g. one worker of uwsgi). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.10.10 and 2.11.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCSRF protection bypass in CKAN where flask-wtf.csrf.CSRFProtect() module-level variable gets modified at request-time when unauthenticated requests access certain endpoints. This permanently disables CSRF protection for that specific server worker process, allowing attackers to craft CSRF attacks against authenticated users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.10.10>= 2.11.0, < 2.11.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed CKAN versionRun `ckan --version` or check the version file in the CKAN installation directoryAffected if Version is < 2.10.10 or >= 2.11.0 and < 2.11.5
-
Verify CSRF protection configurationInspect the CKAN configuration file (typically .ini) for flask-wtf CSRF settings and check if CSRFProtect is being used in the application codeAffected if CSRF protection is enabled but the application uses the vulnerable flask-wtf.csrf.CSRFProtect pattern without additional safeguards
-
Check for exposed unauthenticated endpointsReview the CKAN routing configuration for endpoints accessible without authentication that may trigger the vulnerable code pathAffected if Unauthenticated endpoints exist that can trigger the request-time modification of the CSRF protection variable
The environment is affected if CKAN version is less than 2.10.10 or between 2.11.0 and 2.11.5 inclusive, and the application exposes unauthenticated endpoints that can trigger the flask-wtf.csrf.CSRFProtect modification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.10.102.11.5
Upgrade CKAN to version 2.10.10 or 2.11.5 to receive the security patch that prevents request-time modification of the CSRF protection configuration.
CKAN 2.10.10 or CKAN 2.11.5 (depending on your major version branch)
- 1. Backup your current CKAN database and configuration files before proceeding
- 2. Identify your current CKAN version using `ckan --version` or checking your installed package
- 3. For CKAN 2.10.x users: Upgrade to version 2.10.10 or later
- 4. For CKAN 2.11.x users: Upgrade to version 2.11.5 or later
- 5. Apply the upgrade using your deployment method (e.g., pip install --upgrade ckan, package manager, or source installation)
- 6. Restart all CKAN services and workers (including uwsgi processes) to ensure the CSRF protection fix takes effect
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the CKAN version
- 8. Test that CSRF protection is functioning correctly on your deployment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41255 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41255 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data