CVE-2026-4131
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe WP Responsive Popup + Optin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.4. This is due to the settings form on the admin page (wpo_admin_page.php) lacking nonce generation (wp_nonce_field) and verification (wp_verify_nonce/check_admin_referer). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update all plugin settings including the 'wpo_image_url' parameter via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe WP Responsive Popup + Optin WordPress plugin lacks anti-CSRF tokens (nonce fields) on its admin settings form in wpo_admin_page.php. This allows unauthenticated attackers to forge requests that modify plugin settings, including the 'wpo_image_url' parameter, by tricking authenticated administrators into clicking malicious links.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify WP Responsive Popup + Optin plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'WP Responsive Popup + Optin' or check wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder containing 'popup' or 'wpo' in the nameAffected if The plugin is installed and active
-
Identify the installed plugin versionCheck the plugin's main PHP file header for 'Version:' comment, or look in WordPress plugin repository for the installed version, or inspect the plugin folder for a readme.txt file containing version infoAffected if Installed version falls within any affected range (check WordPress plugin repository for vulnerable versions)
-
Locate the vulnerable fileNavigate to wp-content/plugins/[plugin-folder]/includes/wpo_admin_page.php (path may vary by installation)Affected if The file wpo_admin_page.php exists in the plugin directory
-
Check for missing nonce validation in admin formOpen wpo_admin_page.php and search for the admin settings form handling code; look for 'wpo_image_url' parameter processing and check if wp_nonce_field(), wp_verify_nonce(), or check_admin_referer() is called before processing this parameterAffected if The form processing for 'wpo_image_url' lacks nonce verification (no wp_nonce_field in the form and no nonce check before processing)
-
Inspect the form output for nonce fieldView the page source when visiting the plugin's admin settings page; search for an input field with name containing 'nonce' or '_wpnonce' related to the settings formAffected if The admin settings form does not contain a hidden nonce field (input type="hidden" with nonce-related name)
You are affected if the WP Responsive Popup + Optin plugin is installed and its admin settings form in wpo_admin_page.php processes the 'wpo_image_url' parameter without verifying a nonce token.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patch when available; until then, admin users should avoid clicking untrusted links to prevent CSRF attacks that could modify plugin settings.
Version 1.5 or later of WP Responsive Popup + Optin plugin
- Check the current version of the WP Responsive Popup + Optin plugin installed on your WordPress site
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard
- If the installed version is 1.4 or earlier, update the plugin to the latest available version (version 1.5 or later, which contains the CSRF fix)
- After updating, verify that the plugin settings remain intact and functioning correctly
- As a general security practice, ensure WordPress core and all other plugins are also kept up to date
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4131 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- www.wordfence.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4131 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data