Confidential ContainersApplication · Katacontainers

CVE-2026-41326

HIGH · 8.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.20.0 / 3.29.0 or later.
See remediation →
91/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Kata Containers is an open source project focusing on a standard implementation of lightweight Virtual Machines (VMs) that perform like containers. From v3.4.0 to v3.28.0, an oversight in the CopyFile policy (and perhaps the CopyFile handler) allows untrusted hosts to write to arbitrary locations inside the guest workload image. This can be used to overwrite binaries inside the guest and exfiltrate data from containers; even those running inside CVMs. This vulnerability is fixed in v3.29.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Confidential ContainersApplication
Affected:>= 0.9.0, < 0.20.0
Kata ContainersApplication
Affected:>= 3.4.0, < 3.29.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.20.0 / 3.29.0 or later
Fixed in 0.20.03.29.0
Vendor patch github.com →
Recommended fix High confidence

Kata Containers >= 3.29.0; Confidential Containers >= 0.20.0

  1. 1. Identify which product (Kata Containers or Confidential Containers) is deployed in your environment
  2. 2. For Kata Containers: Check current version using 'kata-runtime --version' or 'kata-ctl version'
  3. 3. For Confidential Containers: Check current version using 'cc-operator version' or checking the operator deployment
  4. 4. Upgrade Kata Containers to version 3.29.0 or later by following the standard upgrade procedure for your deployment method (e.g., package manager, operator, or manual installation)
  5. 5. Upgrade Confidential Containers to version 0.20.0 or later by upgrading the cooperator or individual components
  6. 6. After upgrade, verify the running version matches or exceeds the fixed release
  7. 7. Test that guest workloads function normally after the upgrade
Caveat Review release notes for any breaking changes between your current version and 3.29.0/0.20.0 before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can perform the upgrade in your staging environment and verify nothing breaks — typical engagement from $1,950. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41326 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41326 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data