CVE-2026-41387
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenClaw before 2026.3.22 contains an incomplete host environment variable sanitization vulnerability in host-env-security-policy.json and host-env-security.ts that allows package-manager environment overrides. Attackers can exploit approved exec requests to redirect package resolution or runtime bootstrap to attacker-controlled infrastructure and execute trojanized content.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpenClaw before version 2026.3.22 has incomplete sanitization of host environment variables in host-env-security-policy.json and host-env-security.ts. This allows attackers to use approved exec requests to override package-manager environment variables, redirecting package resolution or runtime bootstrap to attacker-controlled infrastructure and execute malicious trojanized content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.3.22CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check OpenClaw installed versionRun the command to retrieve the OpenClaw version (such as openclaw --version, claw --version, or check the package.json version field) and compare it to the affected range: versions prior to 2026.3.22Affected if The installed version is lower than 2026.3.22
-
Locate host-env-security-policy.jsonSearch for the file named host-env-security-policy.json in the OpenClaw installation directory or configuration folder and examine its contentsAffected if The file exists but lacks complete environment variable sanitization or allows package-manager related environment variables to pass through unchecked
-
Locate host-env-security.tsSearch for the file named host-env-security.ts in the OpenClaw source or configuration directory and review its environment variable handling logicAffected if The file exists and contains incomplete sanitization of host environment variables, particularly those related to package management
-
Inspect exec request configurationsReview any exec request configurations or policy files that define approved exec commands, looking for entries that permit environment variable injection or manipulationAffected if There are exec request configurations that allow environment variables to be set or overridden without proper validation
-
Check package-manager environment variablesExamine the runtime environment for package-manager related environment variables (such as those controlling package resolution or bootstrap) that could be redirected to external infrastructureAffected if Package-manager environment variables can be controlled through exec requests or are not blocked by the security policy
You are affected if OpenClaw version is lower than 2026.3.22 AND the host environment variable sanitization in the security policy files is incomplete or missing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.3.22
Update to OpenClaw version 2026.3.22 or later which contains complete host environment variable sanitization. Review and validate all exec requests for environment variable manipulation until the patch is applied.
2026.3.22
- 1. Identify the current version of OpenClaw installed in your environment
- 2. Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.3.22 or later
- 3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the OpenClaw version
- 4. Review host-env-security-policy.json and host-env-security.ts to confirm environment variable sanitization is properly configured
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41387 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41387 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data