Uncontrolled Search Path (DLL Hijack)Weakness · CWE-427

CVE-2026-4158

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.0 Published 2026-04-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
KeePassXC OpenSSL Configuration Uncontrolled Search Path Element Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of KeePassXC. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of OpenSSL. The product loads configuration from an unsecured location. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of KeePassXC when run by a target user on the system. Was ZDI-CAN-29156.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

KeePassXC loads its OpenSSL configuration from an unsecured location, allowing a local attacker who already has low-privileged code execution to manipulate the OpenSSL config file and escalate privileges to execute arbitrary code in the context of the user running KeePassXC.

MitigationSecure the OpenSSL configuration path by ensuring KeePassXC loads only from a controlled, non-writable location; verify config file permissions and consider explicitly specifying a secure config path or environment variable.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify KeePassXC installation and version
    Run 'keepassxc --version' or check your package manager for the installed KeePassXC version
    Affected if The installed version is any version that loads OpenSSL config from an unsecured path (check vendor advisories for specific affected versions)
  2. Locate the OpenSSL configuration file used by KeePassXC
    Run 'openssl version -d' to see the default OpenSSL directory, then examine KeePassXC behavior or documentation to determine which config file it references; check environment variables like OPENSSL_CONF
    Affected if The OpenSSL config path is located in a directory writable by non-privileged users (e.g., user home directory, world-writable paths)
  3. Verify file permissions on the OpenSSL config
    Run 'ls -la <openssl_config_file>' to check ownership and permissions; the file should not be world-writable or writable by the attacking user's group
    Affected if The OpenSSL config file is writable by any user other than the KeePassXC owner or root
  4. Check if the config directory allows write access
    Run 'ls -ld <openssl_config_directory>' to check directory permissions; a directory writable by low-privileged users allows config injection
    Affected if The directory containing the OpenSSL config has write permissions for non-privileged users or group
  5. Verify KeePassXC process user context
    Run 'ps aux | grep keepassxc' to confirm which user runs KeePassXC; check if that user has write access to the identified config path
    Affected if KeePassXC runs under a user that shares group or world-writable access to the OpenSSL config location

You are affected if KeePassXC loads its OpenSSL configuration from a path that low-privileged local users can modify, allowing injection of malicious OpenSSL directives.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Secure the OpenSSL configuration path by ensuring KeePassXC loads only from a controlled, non-writable location; verify config file permissions and consider explicitly specifying a secure config path or environment variable.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4158 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4158 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data