CVE-2026-41658
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdmidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.9, the Admidio inventory module enforces authorization for destructive operations (delete, retire, reinstate) only in the UI layer by conditionally rendering buttons. The backend POST handlers at modules/inventory.php for item_delete, item_retire, item_reinstate, item_picture_upload, item_picture_save, and item_picture_delete perform CSRF validation but never check whether the requesting user is an inventory administrator. Any authenticated user who can access the inventory module can permanently delete any inventory item and all its associated data. This issue has been patched in version 5.0.9.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdmidio inventory module has a broken access control vulnerability where backend POST handlers (item_delete, item_retire, item_reinstate, item_picture_upload, item_picture_save, item_picture_delete) in modules/inventory.php perform CSRF validation but skip authorization checks for inventory administrator role. Any authenticated user with module access can permanently delete any inventory item.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Admidio installation and versionCheck for the presence of Admidio files (e.g., index.php, version.php) in your web root or check the admidio version through the application's about page or version.php fileAffected if Admidio version is present and is lower than 5.0.9 (the fixed version)
-
Confirm inventory module is enabledCheck if the inventory module is active in Admidio by reviewing the module configuration or checking for modules/inventory.php in the installation directoryAffected if The inventory module (modules/inventory.php) exists and is accessible/enabled in the application
-
Verify user role configuration for inventoryReview the role-based access control settings for the inventory module in Admidio's administration panel under Roles or module-specific permissionsAffected if Non-administrator users or roles have been granted access to the inventory module without proper restrictions
-
Test for authorization bypassAs an authenticated user with only basic inventory module access (non-administrator), attempt to send a POST request to the inventory.php handlers (item_delete, item_retire, etc.) targeting an item owned by another user to observe if the action succeedsAffected if The action completes successfully without returning an authorization error, indicating the missing authorization check is present
A user is affected if they run Admidio with an inventory module enabled and the installed version is below 5.0.9, allowing any authenticated user with module access to perform administrative actions on inventory items.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Admidio version 5.0.9 or later, which includes proper authorization checks in the backend. Verify that role-based access controls are correctly configured for the inventory module.
Admidio version 5.0.9
- 1. Identify the Admidio installation directory on your server
- 2. Backup both the Admidio database and all application files before proceeding with any changes
- 3. Check the current installed version (typically via the admin dashboard or version file in the installation)
- 4. Download Admidio version 5.0.9 from the official repository or distribution source
- 5. Replace the existing application files with the new version 5.0.9 files, preserving any local configuration files if required
- 6. Run any database migration scripts included in the 5.0.9 release if applicable
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the new version number in the admin interface
- 8. Log in as a non-administrative user with access to the inventory module and confirm authorization controls are now properly enforced on delete, retire, reinstate, and picture operations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41658 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41658 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data