CVE-2026-41716
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSpring Data's internal property-lookup cache accepts and permanently retains attacker-supplied strings as cache keys, allowing heap exhaustion through repeated requests. Affected versions: Spring Data Commons 2.7.0 through 2.7.19; 3.3.0 through 3.3.16; 3.4.0 through 3.4.14; 3.5.0 through 3.5.11; 4.0.0 through 4.0.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSpring Data Commons contains an internal property-lookup cache that improperly accepts attacker-controlled strings as cache keys and retains them indefinitely, enabling an attacker to repeatedly send unique strings to exhaust heap memory and cause a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.7.0, < 2.7.20>= 3.3.0, < 3.3.17>= 3.4.0, < 3.4.15>= 3.5.0, < 3.5.11.1>= 4.0.0, < 4.0.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Spring Data Commons dependencySearch your project build files (pom.xml, build.gradle) or the application's classpath for the spring-data-commons JAR. List all JAR files containing 'spring-data-commons' in the lib or lib directory.Affected if The spring-data-commons library is present in your application runtime
-
Determine installed versionExtract the version from the JAR file name (spring-data-commons-X.X.X.jar) or check the MANIFEST.MF file inside the JAR. If using Maven/Gradle, run 'mvn dependency:list' or 'gradle dependencies' and filter for spring-data-commons.Affected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 2.7.0 to 2.7.19, 3.3.0 to 3.3.16, 3.4.0 to 3.4.14, 3.5.0 to 3.5.11, or 4.0.0 to 4.0.5
-
Check for Spring Data repository usageReview your codebase for interfaces extending Repository, CrudRepository, PagingAndSortingRepository, or JpaRepository from org.springframework.data.repository. Also search for usages of PropertyPath or related property lookup APIs.Affected if Your application uses Spring Data repository interfaces or property path resolution that triggers the vulnerable cache
-
Identify exposed endpoints accepting string inputReview controller or service code for endpoints that accept arbitrary string parameters (path variables, query parameters, request body fields) which could be passed to repository queries or property lookups. Focus on endpoints that directly use input in findBy, getBy, or property access patterns.Affected if The application has REST endpoints or APIs that accept user-supplied strings and pass them to Spring Data query methods or property resolution
You are affected if your application uses a vulnerable version of Spring Data Commons AND exposes endpoints that accept attacker-controlled strings which get processed by Spring Data repositories or property lookup APIs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.7.203.3.173.4.15
Upgrade Spring Data Commons to version 2.7.20, 3.3.17, 3.4.15, 3.5.12, or 4.0.6 or later, which implement bounds on the cache or sanitize input.
Spring Data Commons 2.7.20, 3.3.17, 3.4.15, or 3.5.11.1 (depending on your current major.minor line)
- Identify the current Spring Data Commons version in your project's dependency management (pom.xml, build.gradle, or Maven/Gradle wrapper)
- Upgrade Spring Data Commons to the appropriate fixed version based on your current major.minor line: for 2.7.x upgrade to 2.7.20, for 3.3.x upgrade to 3.3.17, for 3.4.x upgrade to 3.4.15, for 3.5.x upgrade to 3.5.11.1
- If using Spring Boot, ensure you upgrade to a compatible Spring Boot version that bundles the fixed Spring Data Commons release
- Rebuild and test the application to verify the upgrade does not introduce regressions
- Deploy the updated application
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41716 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41716 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data