Spring FrameworkFramework / library · VMware

CVE-2026-41850

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.3.49 / 6.1.28 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Applications that evaluate user-supplied Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions are vulnerable to an Algorithmic Denial of Service (DoS). By providing a specially crafted expression, an attacker can trigger excessive resource consumption during evaluation, leading to application degradation or unavailability. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Applications that evaluate user-supplied Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions are vulnerable to an Algorithmic Denial of Service (DoS) attack. Specially crafted SpEL expressions can trigger excessive resource consumption during evaluation, causing application degradation or unavailability.

MitigationUpgrade Spring Framework to version 5.3.49, 6.1.28, 6.2.19, or 7.0.8 or later. Additionally, avoid evaluating user-supplied SpEL expressions; if unavoidable, implement expression sandboxing, evaluation timeouts, and input length/validation constraints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Spring FrameworkFramework / library
Affected:>= 5.3.0, < 5.3.49>= 6.1.0, < 6.1.28>= 6.2.0, < 6.2.18.1>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.7.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Spring Framework version
    Locate the spring-core or spring-context JAR file in your application's classpath and check its version metadata. Common locations: WEB-INF/lib directory, Maven dependencies (mvn dependency:tree), or Gradle dependencies (gradle dependencies). The version is typically visible in the JAR filename or dependency report.
    Affected if The installed version falls within 5.3.0 to 5.3.48, 6.1.0 to 6.1.27, 6.2.0 to 6.2.18, or 7.0.0 to 7.0.7.
  2. Determine if SpEL is used in the application
    Search code for imports of org.springframework.expression and usage of SpelExpressionParser or ExpressionParser. Also check for @Value annotations with expressions, SpelExpressionParser instances, or any code paths that parse expressions from strings.
    Affected if The application uses SpelExpressionParser or any SpEL parsing mechanism to evaluate expressions.
  3. Check if user input reaches SpEL evaluation
    Audit code paths where SpEL expressions are evaluated. Look for patterns where request parameters, headers, query strings, or any external input flows into SpelExpressionParser.parseExpression() or similar evaluation methods. Trace data flow from HTTP endpoints to SpEL evaluation points.
    Affected if User-supplied or external data (HTTP parameters, headers, file contents, database values) can be passed as the expression string to be evaluated.
  4. Inspect SpEL configuration and expression beans
    Review Spring configuration files (XML, Java config, or properties) for beans of type Expression or SpelExpressionParser. Check for any custom evaluators or expression templates that may accept runtime values. Look for template-based expression usage like ExpressionTemplate.
    Affected if Expression beans are configured to accept dynamic or external expression strings at runtime.

You are affected if your application runs a vulnerable Spring Framework version AND evaluates user-supplied SpEL expressions from external input sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.3.49 / 6.1.28 / 6.2.18.1 or later
Fixed in 5.3.496.1.286.2.18.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Spring Framework to version 5.3.49, 6.1.28, 6.2.19, or 7.0.8 or later. Additionally, avoid evaluating user-supplied SpEL expressions; if unavoidable, implement expression sandboxing, evaluation timeouts, and input length/validation constraints.

Recommended fix High confidence

Spring Framework 5.3.49+ / 6.1.28+ / 6.2.18.1+ / 7.0.7.1+ (choose the appropriate version line for your current major.minor)

  1. 1. Identify all applications and dependencies that use Spring Framework and evaluate SpEL expressions from user input.
  2. 2. For Spring Framework 5.3.x: Upgrade to version 5.3.49 or later.
  3. 3. For Spring Framework 6.1.x: Upgrade to version 6.1.28 or later.
  4. 4. For Spring Framework 6.2.x: Upgrade to version 6.2.18.1 or later.
  5. 5. For Spring Framework 7.0.x: Upgrade to version 7.0.7.1 or later.
  6. 6. Rebuild and redeploy all affected applications with the updated Spring Framework dependencies.
  7. 7. Test applications to verify they function correctly with the new Spring Framework version.
  8. 8. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement input validation to reject or sanitize user-supplied SpEL expressions before evaluation, and configure expression evaluation timeouts if supported.
Caveat Minor/patch releases typically have low breaking change risk, but review Spring Framework release notes for any deprecation notices or behavioral changes in your version range.

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Spring Framework Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,220
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,552.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41850 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41850 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data