Improper Access ControlWeakness · CWE-284

CVE-2026-4191

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw has been found in JawherKl node-api-postgres up to 2.5. Affected is the function path.extname of the file index.js of the component Profile Picture Handler. This manipulation causes unrestricted upload. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Profile Picture Handler in JawherKl node-api-postgres up to v2.5 uses path.extname() to validate uploaded files, which can be easily bypassed using double extensions (e.g., avatar.php.jpg) or by manipulating the filename. This allows attackers to upload executable files to the server, leading to remote code execution.

MitigationReplace extension-based validation with whitelist filtering AND content-type/magic-byte verification; store uploads outside the webroot with randomized filenames; implement strict allowlist for permitted file types for profile pictures.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed version of node-api-postgres
    Check the package.json file in the project root for the version of the 'node-api-postgres' dependency, or run 'npm list node-api-postgres' to see the installed version
    Affected if The version is 2.5 or lower, or if no specific version is listed (implying an unpatched release)
  2. Locate the profile picture upload handler
    Search the codebase for files handling profile picture uploads; look for routes or controllers containing 'avatar', 'profile', 'upload', or 'picture' in the filename or handler name
    Affected if The upload handler exists and processes user-submitted files for profile pictures
  3. Examine the file validation logic in the upload handler
    Open the upload handler file and inspect the code that validates uploaded files; look for path.extname() being used to check file extensions
    Affected if The code uses path.extname() alone to validate file types without additional content-type or magic-byte verification
  4. Check how uploaded files are stored
    Find the code that moves or saves uploaded files; determine the destination directory and whether it is inside or outside the webroot
    Affected if Uploaded files are stored in a publicly accessible webroot directory with the original or predictable filenames
  5. Verify if extension allowlisting is enforced
    Review the upload validation logic to see if it uses a whitelist of permitted extensions (e.g., only .jpg, .png, .gif) rather than relying on extension extraction via path.extname()
    Affected if The validation does not use a strict allowlist or does not combine extension checking with content-type/magic-byte verification

You are affected if you are running node-api-postgres v2.5 or lower and the profile picture upload handler relies solely on path.extname() for file validation without additional content verification or strict allowlisting.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace extension-based validation with whitelist filtering AND content-type/magic-byte verification; store uploads outside the webroot with randomized filenames; implement strict allowlist for permitted file types for profile pictures.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4191 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4191 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data