CVE-2026-41926
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWDR201A WiFi Extender (HW V2.1, FW LFMZX28040922V1.02) contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the firewall.cgi binary across five request handlers that apply insufficient input validation. Attackers can inject arbitrary shell commands through vulnerable parameters like websURLFilter, websHostFilter, portForward, singlePortForward, and ipportFilter using subshell syntax or unfiltered parameters, with payloads persisting in NVRAM and re-executing on every subsequent firewall.cgi request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in WDR201A WiFi Extender's firewall.cgi binary allows arbitrary shell command execution through five parameters (websURLFilter, websHostFilter, portForward, singlePortForward, ipportFilter) with payloads persisting in NVRAM and re-executing on each request.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is WDR201AAccess the device's web admin interface or check the device label/metadata to verify the exact model numberAffected if Device is not a WDR201A WiFi Extender, then likely not affected by this specific CVE
-
Identify firmware versionLog into the device admin panel (typically at 192.168.0.1 or 192.168.1.1) and navigate to Status or System settings to view the firmware versionAffected if Firmware version is unknown or falls within the range where this command injection vulnerability exists (compare against vendor release notes for patches)
-
Inspect NVRAM for malicious entriesAccess the device via SSH or Telnet if enabled, then run 'nvram show' or 'grep' for the affected parameter names (websURLFilter, websHostFilter, portForward, singlePortForward, ipportFilter) to see if they contain shell metacharacters like ; | & $ or unusual command stringsAffected if NVRAM contains any of these parameters with command-like content (shell commands, URLs with suspicious patterns, IP addresses combined with operators)
-
Check firewall.cgi accessibility and behaviorSend a crafted HTTP request to the firewall.cgi endpoint using one of the five affected parameters (e.g., http://<device_ip>/cgi-bin/firewall.cgi?websURLFilter=test) and observe if commands execute or return unexpected outputAffected if The device responds to these parameter queries and exhibits unexpected behavior suggesting command execution
-
Review device logs for suspicious activityCheck system logs, web server logs, or NVRAM logs for any entries containing the five affected parameter names combined with shell syntax or repeated identical requestsAffected if Logs show repeated requests to these parameters or entries containing shell command patterns
A user is affected if they own a WDR201A WiFi Extender with unpatched firmware, and NVRAM inspection or log analysis reveals the vulnerable parameters contain injected commands or exhibit unexpected execution behavior.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware update if available; otherwise isolate device on restricted network segment or replace device entirely, as embedded devices often lack patches for legacy vulnerabilities.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41926 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41926 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data