CVE-2026-41953
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in BIG-IP systems where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Resource Administrator role can modify configuration objects resulting in privilege escalation. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis BIG-IP vulnerability allows a highly privileged authenticated attacker with Resource Administrator role to modify configuration objects and escalate privileges within the system. The attack leverages configuration manipulation to gain elevated access beyond the attacker's current permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or check the BIG-IP GUI under Dashboard > System > Software VersionAffected if The installed version falls within these ranges: 17.1.0-17.1.3, 17.5.0-17.5.1, 16.1.0-16.1.6, or exactly 21.0.0
-
Confirm the affected module is deployedRun 'tmsh list sys module' to list installed modules, or check System > Resource > Module Assignment in the GUIAffected if Any of these modules are installed and enabled: APM, AFM, AWM, Analytics, AAM, ASM, AVR, or Automation Toolchain on an affected version
-
Identify Resource Administrator role accountsRun 'tmsh list auth user' and review the 'role' field, or check Access > Authentication > Users in the GUIAffected if Any user account is assigned the Resource Administrator role
-
Audit recent configuration changesRun 'tmsh show sys config-sync' or review the configuration audit log at /var/log/audit for modifications to '/Common' or '/Partition' configuration objectsAffected if Configuration changes were made by Resource Administrator users that grant elevated permissions beyond their assigned role
-
Check for unauthorized privilege escalationReview user role assignments using 'tmsh list auth user' and compare against expected baseline permissions, look for unexpected changes to admin or administrator rolesAffected if Users have been granted higher privileges (such as Administrator) that were not assigned through normal administration channels
Your system is affected if it runs an affected BIG-IP version (17.1.0-17.1.3, 17.5.0-17.5.1, 16.1.0-16.1.6, or 21.0.0) with any affected module enabled and has accounts with Resource Administrator role present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict Resource Administrator role permissions to only necessary operations, implement least-privilege access controls, and apply available vendor patches. Review and audit all configuration changes made by privileged accounts.
Upgrade to BIG-IP 17.1.4 (or later 17.1.x), 17.5.2 (or later 17.5.x), 16.1.7 (or later 16.1.x), or 21.0.1 (or later 21.x) based on your release line
- 1. Identify the exact BIG-IP version currently installed by running 'tmsh show sys version' or checking the web UI login page.
- 2. Determine which affected product module (APM, AFM, ASM, etc.) is deployed in your environment.
- 3. Review the F5 KB article at my.f5.com for the specific fixed version corresponding to your major release line (17.x, 16.x, or 21.x).
- 4. Download the fixed version from F5 Downloads at https://downloads.f5.com/ or obtain via your F5 account.
- 5. Plan maintenance window as upgrade requires system reboot; back up current configuration using 'tmsh save sys config' or via web UI.
- 6. Perform upgrade following F5 upgrade guide: upload ISO via web UI or tmsh, verify integrity, install, and reboot.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the fix by checking 'tmsh show sys version' shows the patched version.
- 8. Confirm the Resource Administrator role permissions align with least-privilege principles.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-41953 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-41953 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data