Loki DatasourceApplication · Grafana

CVE-2026-42129

HIGH · 7.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
83/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A user with Viewer permissions can use a path traversal in the Loki data source plugin to reach administrative Loki endpoints and read sensitive backend configuration and internal service information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A path traversal vulnerability in the Loki data source plugin allows users with Viewer-level permissions to bypass intended access restrictions and traverse paths to reach administrative Loki endpoints, enabling unauthorized access to sensitive backend configuration files and internal service information.

MitigationApply proper input validation and path sanitization in the Loki data source plugin to prevent path traversal sequences, and enforce strict permission checks ensuring Viewer users cannot access administrative endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Loki DatasourceApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Loki datasource is enabled
    Navigate to Configuration > Data Sources in Grafana UI or query the /api/datasources API endpoint to list configured datasources. Look for 'Loki' in the datasource list.
    Affected if Loki datasource appears in the configured datasources list
  2. Identify Viewer-role users or service accounts
    Navigate to Configuration > Users and Teams in Grafana UI, or query the /api/users and /api/org/roles API endpoints. List all users assigned the Viewer role.
    Affected if Any user account with Viewer role exists in the system
  3. Check Viewer permission to Loki datasource
    Navigate to Configuration > Data Sources > Loki > Permissions, or inspect the datasource JSON configuration for 'accessControl' or 'readOnly' settings. Verify if Viewer role is granted query or browse permissions.
    Affected if Viewer role has query, read, or browse permissions enabled on the Loki datasource
  4. Test path traversal access to Loki admin endpoints
    Using an authenticated session as a Viewer user, attempt a curl request to a Loki administrative endpoint using path traversal sequences, such as: GET /api/datasources/uid/{loki-uid}/resources/../../admin/config or similar path patterns pointing to internal Loki endpoints.
    Affected if The request returns sensitive configuration data, backend service information, or administrative responses instead of being rejected with 403 Forbidden

Your environment is affected if the Loki datasource is enabled and Viewer-role users can query it, as the path traversal bypass allows them to access administrative endpoints.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply proper input validation and path sanitization in the Loki data source plugin to prevent path traversal sequences, and enforce strict permission checks ensuring Viewer users cannot access administrative endpoints.

Fix this in Loki Datasource Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42129 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42129 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data