Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2026-42196

CRITICAL · 9.9 CVSS v4.0 Published 2026-05-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
django-s3file is a lightweight file upload input for Django and Amazon S3. Prior to 7.0.2, S3FileMiddleware is vulnerable to relative path traversal attacks, where an attacker can use a modified request to escape pre-signed upload locations and have the Django application load files from random locations into request.FILES. Depending on how files are handled, this may lead to confidentiality and integrity issues. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.0.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

django-s3file's S3FileMiddleware contains a relative path traversal vulnerability allowing attackers to modify requests and escape pre-signed upload locations. This forces the Django application to load files from arbitrary system locations into request.FILES, potentially exposing sensitive files or enabling code execution depending on downstream file handling.

MitigationUpgrade django-s3file to version 7.0.2 or later. Audit all code handling request.FILES to ensure files from untrusted sources are not processed in security-sensitive ways.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify django-s3file installation and version
    Run 'pip show django-s3file' or check your requirements.txt/poetry.lock for the installed version of django-s3file
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 7.0.2 (e.g., 7.0.1, 7.0.0, or earlier)
  2. Verify S3FileMiddleware is enabled
    Check your Django settings.py for 's3file.middleware.S3FileMiddleware' in the MIDDLEWARE or MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES setting
    Affected if S3FileMiddleware is present and enabled in the Django configuration
  3. Confirm file upload handling is in use
    Search your Django project for views that process request.FILES, form handling with FileField, or file upload views using multipart form data
    Affected if The application processes file uploads through request.FILES and uses django-s3file for S3 handling
  4. Check for path traversal mitigation in upload logic
    Inspect the code that handles uploaded files - look for whether filenames are sanitized before use, especially for path components like '..' or absolute paths
    Affected if Uploaded file paths are not validated and can contain relative path traversal sequences

You are affected if django-s3file version is below 7.0.2 AND S3FileMiddleware is enabled AND your application processes file uploads from request.FILES.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade django-s3file to version 7.0.2 or later. Audit all code handling request.FILES to ensure files from untrusted sources are not processed in security-sensitive ways.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

7.0.2

  1. Check the currently installed version of django-s3file using pip show django-s3file or requirements file inspection
  2. Upgrade django-s3file to version 7.0.2 or later using: pip install django-s3file>=7.0.2
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
  4. Test the application to ensure file uploads still function correctly after the upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,840.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42196 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42196 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data